The British conquest of Jerusalem

 Jews, Muslim and Christians were allied against British and Zionist imperialism.

Image result for we are palestine jews

Ecerpt

On the 31st of October 1917 the British took Beer Sheva and started to make their way towards Jerusalem.

In the upcoming days the raids and the fighting in the area intensified, and the residents decided to leave their homes until the situation quietened down .They rented rooms in the nearby Arab village. This did not help Yellin, who took his kettle with him. At nights, the soldiers appeared in the village, and forced the woman whose home he was staying at to give them his biggest cow. The frightened woman woke the whole village.

The fear of the soldiers united the Arab villagers and their Jewish guests and they decided to send a delegation of two Arab women and two Jewish women (the men were mostly army deserters), to the military governor in Dir Yassin, and ask for the Army’s protection. But this did not end their plight. On 12th December, the Turkish army issued an evacuation order from Motza and its nearby Arab villages.

The area was defined as a military zone and all residents were to leave in twelve hours in order to make way for the great battle between the Turks and the British planned for the 3rd of December. “You can imagine”, Yellin addresses his readers, “the great confusion and commotion among the residents. Neither of us slept a wink all night”.

International Holocaust™ Remembrance Alliance : Working Definition of Antisemitism

Nations of the world accepted the clear lie when they recognized the Zionists, those heretics who established their state through conquest under the name of “Israel,” as any part of the Jewish People. The nations thereby enabled the Zionist heretics to conquer the Jewish People themselves. ~Rabbi AMRAM BLAU

The Zionists work relentlessly to undertake all actions to provoke the nations where these Jews live, and then turn around and advertise themselves as the saviors and benefactors of the Jews.

 These destroyers have already managed to destroy and burn Jewish souls in their concentration camp and gas chambers. TENS OF THOUSANDS OF JEWS AND THEIR CHILDREN HAVE BEEN VIRTUALLY WIPED OUT. MOST OF THE JEWISH PEOPLE HAVE FALLEN INTO THEIR HANDS, JEWISH COMMUNITIES ALL OVER THE WORLD WERE DRAWN INTO THEIR STATE AS IS WELL KNOWN.~~ RABBI SHAUL BRACH

Image result for jews against zionism zionism is satanism

 

Basically what the European founders of “Israel” do is try and infuse themselves with the real Jews, who denounce them. The public at large don’t understand the difference. That’s The Game.

IHRA adopted the Working Definition of Antisemitism at a plenary session in 2016. On 1 June 2017, the European Parliament voted to adopt a resolution calling on European Union member states and their institutions to adopt and apply the definition. The non-legally binding working definition includes illustrative examples of antisemitism to guide the IHRA in its work.

These examples include classical antisemitic tropes, Holocaust™ denial and attempts to apply a double standard to the State of Israel. Although internationally recognized by many groups, the working definition of antisemitism has been criticized by some as too broad, and conflating anti-Zionism with antisemitism.

Here’s a list of the countries that have accepted in full the IHRA definition of AS: UK, Israel, Austria, Romania, Germany, Bulgaria, Lithuania, Macedonia.

To guide IHRA in its work, the following examples may serve as illustrations:
 
Manifestations might include the targeting of the state of Israel, conceived as a Jewish collectivity. However, criticism of Israel similar to that leveled against any other country cannot be regarded as antisemitic. Antisemitism frequently charges (European*) Jews with conspiring to harm humanity, and it is often used to blame Jews for “why things go wrong.” It is expressed in speech, writing, visual forms and action, and employs sinister stereotypes and negative character traits.

Image result for jews against zionism

 

Contemporary examples of antisemitism in public life, the media, schools, the workplace, and in the religious sphere could, taking into account the overall context, include, but are not limited to:

  • Calling for, aiding, or justifying the killing or harming of Jews in the name of a radical ideology or an extremist view of religion.
     
  • Making mendacious, dehumanizing, demonizing, or stereotypical allegations about Jews as such or the power of Jews as collective — such as, especially but not exclusively, the myth about a world Jewish conspiracy or of Jews controlling the media, economy, government or other societal institutions.
    Image result for jews control media and most other institutions
  • Accusing Jews as a people of being responsible for real or imagined wrongdoing committed by a single Jewish person or group, or even for acts committed by non-Jews.
     
  • Denying the fact, scope, mechanisms (e.g. gas chambers) or intentionality of the genocide of the Jewish people at the hands of National Socialist Germany and its supporters and accomplices during World War II (the Holocaust).
     
  • Accusing the Jews as a people, or Israel as a state, of inventing or exaggerating the Holocaust.
    Image result for holocaust revisionism

     

  • Accusing Jewish citizens of being more loyal to Israel, or to the alleged priorities of Jews worldwide, than to the interests of their own nations.
     
  • Denying the Jewish people their right to self-determination, e.g., by claiming that the existence of a State of Israel is a racist endeavor.
    Image result for jews against zionism zionism is satanism

     

  • Applying double standards by requiring of it a behavior not expected or demanded of any other democratic nation.
     
  • Using the symbols and images associated with classic antisemitism (e.g., claims of Jews killing Jesus or blood libel) to characterize Israel or Israelis.
     
  • Drawing comparisons of contemporary Israeli policy to that of the Nazis.
     
  • Holding Jews collectively responsible for actions of the state of Israel.
    Image result for Dual citizens in the white house

Antisemitic acts are criminal when they are so defined by law (for example, denial of the Holocaust or distribution of antisemitic materials in some countries).
 
Criminal acts are antisemitic when the targets of attacks, whether they are people or property – such as buildings, schools, places of worship and cemeteries – are selected because they are, or are perceived to be, Jewish or linked to Jews.
 
Antisemitic discrimination is the denial to Jews of opportunities or services available to others and is illegal in many countries.

Image result for holocaust hollywood

 
 

Was Vietnam a Holocaust for Zion?

Irving Kristol, reacted to Vietnam War critic Senator George McGovern. The presidential contender’s proposed cut in U.S. military expenditure would, according to the “godfather” of neoconservatism, “drive a knife in the heart of Israel.”

• April 2, 2018

 

The Watergate scandal passes today as evidence of the independence of the American media as a necessary counter-power against government abuses. But in reality, it simply illustrates the increasing involvement of the media in deep political warfare.

Likewise we must go beyond the public and Spielbergian narratives on the Pentagon Papers to understand what was really at stake.

In both scandals, I believe the leadership of both the New York Times and the Washington Post, the two biggest propaganda machines in the US, were acting not only in the service of truth, but also in service of a power deeper than the deep state they were exposing.

After all, there are so many truths to choose from to make the front pages. And in matters of foreign policy, many suspect that the final choice is often determined by the ultimate question: Is it good for Israel?

In this article, I am not going to demonstrate, but simply hypothesize, that the leaking and revelation of the Pentagon Papers, and more broadly the role of the media establishment in the anti-Vietnam movement, were in the interest of Israel. At that moment Israel was starting to face a unified international front against its illegal occupation.

There was a real threat that the US would force Israel to withdraw, as required by UN Resolution 242. But I will go further and suggest that the Vietnam War itself, not just the protest against it, served the interests of Israel, regardless of other factors that motivated it.

There is, of course, no contradiction between these two theses, since the anti-Vietnam-war movement presupposes the Vietnam war. Significantly, until around 1969, the Washington Post’s editorials were unequivocally pro-war.

Johnson and the Vietnam War

As I wrote in JFK-9/11 and again in From Yahweh to Zion, if John Kennedy had not been assassinated, the very expression “Vietnam War” would not exist in school textbooks. Under his presidency, US military deployment amounted officially to a mere 15,000 “military advisors.”

At the end of 1963, Kennedy had taken the decision to withdraw from Vietnam. On November 11, he signed directive NSAM-263 for the removal of “1,000 U.S. military personnel by the end of 1963,” in anticipation for withdrawing “by the end of 1965 […] the bulk of U.S. personnel.”[1]

On November 21, the day before his fatal visit to Texas, he expressed his resolution to his assistant press secretary Malcolm Kilduff, after reading a report on the latest casualties: “After I come back from Texas, that’s going to change. There’s no reason for us to lose another man over there. Vietnam is not worth another American life.”[2]

But on November 26, the day after Kennedy’s funeral, Johnson buried NSAM-263 and replaced it with NSAM-273, which required the military to develop a plan “for the United States to begin carrying the war north,” including “different levels of possible increased activity,” and “military operations up to a line up to 50 kilometers inside Laos”—which violated the 1962 Geneva Accords on the neutrality of Laos.[3]

Johnson’s decision regarding Vietnam was a clear betrayal of Kennedy’s earlier policy, and the amazing expediency of his change of policy suggests premeditation. All ambiguities cleverly laid out in NSAM-273 would be lifted by another memo signed on January, 1964 by General Maxwell Taylor, which said: “National Security Action Memorandum n° 273 makes clear the resolve of the President to ensure victory over the externally directed and supported communist insurgency in South Vietnam […].

To do this, we must prepare for whatever level of activity may be required.” It is no longer a question of stopping the war, but rather winnings at any cost. Robert McNamara, continuing as Secretary of Defense, acceded to Johnson’s agenda, recommending the mobilization of 50,000 soldiers and a program of “graduated overt military pressure” against North Vietnam, a policy which Johnson rubberstamped in March 1964 by memorandum NSAM-288.[4]

A suitable pretext was still needed for aggression. It came in Gulf of Tonkin on the 2nd and 4th of August 1964, when torpedoes were allegedly launched by the North Vietnamese against American destroyers. It is now known that the second attack, if not the first, was imaginary, made up out of falsified NSA data.[5]

With that faked event, Johnson could announce on national television a “retaliatory” bombing of the North Vietnamese navy, and push through Congress on August 7, 1964, the Gulf of Tonkin Resolution which gave him full powers to send up to 500,000 soldiers into North Vietnam. With that, Johnson plunged the Vietnamese people into a decade of unspeakable suffering, taking the lives of more than a million civilians.

From 1965 to 1968, as part of Operation Rolling Thunder, 643,000 tons of bombs were dropped—three times more than during the entire Second World War—on a mostly rural country, and about 500,000 American soldiers were sent to Vietnam, where 50,000 perished. 19 million gallons of toxic chemicals were sprayed from the air to destroy approximately 40 percent of the South’s forests, one-third of its valuable mangrove swamps, and large areas of prime cropland.

The chemicals are also suspected of causing widespread health problems, including cancer and birth defects. An estimated 3.5 million Vietnamese were killed directly in the war. One-third of the South’s population became “internal refugees”, their way of life destroyed, forced to live for years in the misery of refugee camps and overfull cities, with prostitution and other social problems as a result.

Since the war ended for the US in 1975, nearly 40,000 Vietnamese have been killed by residual explosives, including an estimated 3.5 million land mines. Many more have been crippled for life. A decade after the war, over 13 percent of Vietnam’s population were still suffering from some war-related injury.[6]

Johnson and the Six Day War

It was during that period that Israel chose to launch its operation to annex Egyptian, Syrian and Jordanian territories, by creating the illusion that it was acting in self-defense. Johnson had given Israel a green light in a letter to Israeli Prime Minister Levi Eshkol, dated June 3: “I want to protect the territorial integrity of Israel […] and will provide as effective American support as possible to preserve the peace and freedom of your nation and of the area.”[7] Johnson also asked the CIA to transmit to the Israeli army the precise positions of the Egyptian air bases to be destroyed.

Four days after the start of the Israeli attack, Nasser accepted the ceasefire request from the UN Security Council. It was too soon for Israel, which had not yet achieved all its objectives. It was then that, on June 8, 1967, the USS Liberty, an unarmed NSA spy ship, was bombed, strafed, and torpedoed for 75 minutes by Israeli Mirage jets and torpedo boats.

The Israelis obviously intended to sink it without leaving any survivors (even the lifeboats were machine-gunned), while Johnson personally prohibited the nearby Sixth Fleet from coming to its rescue. Had the USS Liberty been successfully sunk, the attack would have been blamed on the Egyptians, and would have given Johnson the pretext to intervene militarily alongside Israel, probably forcing the USSR to go to war.[8]

But it failed. The affair was successfully smothered by a commission of inquiry headed by Admiral John Sidney McCain II (father of Arizona Senator John McCain III). The survivors received a medal in an unadvertised ceremony, accompanied by a formal order never to mention the incident. Only recently have some broken the silence.[9] Johnson accepted Israel’s spurious “targeting error” explanation, and rewarded the unprovoked attack by lifting the embargo on the sale of offensive military equipment to Israel.

The USS Liberty failed false flag attack is proof of Johnson’s secret complicity with Israel, and of his high treason against the country he had sworn to protect. But Johnson had in fact always been Israel’s man. As early as 1948, his campaign for a Senate seat had been financed by Abraham Feinberg, president of Americans for Haganah Incorporated and financial godfather of Israel’s atomic bomb.[10] In 2013, the Associated Press reported on newly released tapes from Johnson’s White House office showing LBJ’s “personal and often emotional connection to Israel.”

The tapes showed that during the Johnson presidency, “the United States became Israel’s chief diplomatic ally and primary arms supplier.” An article from the 5 Towns Jewish Times “Our First Jewish President Lyndon Johnson?” recalls Johnson’s continuous support of Jews and Israel in the 1940s and 50s, and concludes: “President Johnson firmly pointed American policy in a pro-Israel direction.”

The article also mentions that, “research into Johnson’s personal history indicates that he inherited his concern for the Jewish people from his family. His aunt Jessie Johnson Hatcher, a major influence on LBJ, was a member of the Zionist Organization of America.” And, in an additional note: “The facts indicate that both of Lyndon Johnson’s great-grandparents, on the maternal side, were Jewish. […] The line of Jewish mothers can be traced back three generations in Lyndon Johnson’s family tree. There is little doubt that he was Jewish.”[11]

LinkBookmarkIt is on record, thanks to Kennedy insider Arthur Schlesinger (A Thousand Days, 1965) that it was in fact Philip Graham and Joseph Alsop, respectively publisher and columnist of the Washington Post, both strong supporters of Israel, who convinced Kennedy to take Johnson on his ticket, in a closed door conversation.[12]

Schlesinger doesn’t reveal Graham and Alsop’s arguments, and states that Kennedy’s final decision “defies historical reconstruction”—a curious statement for a historian so well informed, which can only be explained by Schlesinger’s refusal throughout his 872 pages to come to grips with Kennedy’s Middle East policy and his battle with Zionism. Alan Hart has convincingly filled in the blanks: both Graham and Alsop were strongly pro-Israel as well as pro-Johnson, and both could exert a huge influence on public opinion. So “Kennedy was forced by Israel’s supporters to take Johnson as his vice-presidential running mate.”[13]

The Vietnam Holocaust

Is there a connection between those two wars, each waged or supported by Lyndon Johnson? In my book JFK-9/11, I suggested that Johnson escalated the Vietnam War as a substitute for the invasion of Cuba that the CIA and Pentagon hawks involved in the plot to assassinate JFK had been led to believe that they could start by blaming the assassination on a communist plot. “In lieu of invasion,” I wrote, “Johnson offered to the generals the Vietnam War.”

That was a grossly insufficient explanation. There is little evidence that Pentagon generals, let alone CIA officers, needed a war, any war, at all cost. But I could think of no other explanation, short of the unlimited greed of war profiteers, of whom Johnson was a highly representative specimen.

(In the weeks preceding the Kennedy assassination, he had invested in the Dallas aircraft manufacturer Ling-Temco-Vought, which was to become one of the Pentagon’s biggest arms suppliers for the Vietnam War.[14] Johnson also owned stocks in Bell Helicopter, to which he transferred illegally a contract for 220 helicopters that had been signed in 1963 with its rival Kaman Aircraft.[15])

Only recently did the idea come to me of a hidden link between the Vietnam War and the Six-Day War. I could not conceive it before because I had not yet taken the full measure of the perversity of the Israeli leadership, whose collective psychopathy resonated deeply with Johnson’s personal psychopathy.

Having now studied the deep thinking of those ultra-Machiavellian crypto-Likudniks whom we call neoconservatives, I have acquired the conviction that the tragedy of the world for the last hundred years is only comprehensible once we admit that Israel (before and after 1947) acts on the international scene in a biblical way, that is, with the same indifference and cruelty toward non-Jewish nations that Yahweh demanded of his people in the Bible.

In their eyes, these populations are no more worthy than livestock, and their suffering is irrelevant (unless, of course, it can be exploited). There is absolutely no moral limit to the determination of Israel to pave its way toward hegemony through the ruin of whole nations. Absolutely none. This is what I meant when calling Israel the “psychopathic nation”.

And so my hypothesis is that one of the purposes of the Vietnam War desired by Johnson and his masters was to create a diversion while Israel was engaging in the decisive stage of its expansion. Let us imagine for a moment that there had been no Vietnam War, in 1967 and thereafter, to mobilize Americans’ limited attention on world affairs, and to divert their indignation.

Could the Washington Post and the New York Times have managed to hide from the public the scandal of that war of aggression and illegal annexation? Even more importantly, Israel’s strategists surely understood that the legitimacy of the US state to condemn Israel’s crimes would be much diminished if the US could be blamed for even worse crimes.

French President Charles De Gaulle actually understood that the Vietnam War was preventing a peaceful solution in Palestine. In a press conference on November 27, 1967, after condemning Israel’s aggression and famously qualifying the Jews as “an elite people, self-confident and dominating,” he called for the four great powers to enforce an international settlement on the basis of Israel’s withdrawal from the occupied territories, and added:

“But one cannot see how such an agreement could be reached as long as one of the greatest among the four will not withdraw from the heinous war that they are waging elsewhere. Without the tragedy of Vietnam, the conflict between Israel and the Arabs would not have become what it has become. And if South-East Asia could experience a renewal of peace, the Middle-East would also find its way to peace, in the climate of détente which would follow such an event.”[16]

Soon after that press conference, De Gaulle’s government became the target of a major student protest that culminated in May 1968, ultimately forcing De Gaulle to resign. These students, led by predominantly Jewish Trotskyist activists,[17] were not protesting against the US aggression against Vietnam, nor against Israel’s aggression against its Arab neighbors, but against bourgeois society.

It is not an exaggeration to qualify the Vietnam War as a “holocaust”, as did the 2008 documentary film Vietnam: American Holocaust.[18] In the Bible, a holocaust designates an animal offering completely consumed by fire, producing an “enjoyable smell” for Yahweh (Genesis 8:20-21; Exodus 29:25). According to the Book of Ezra, a gigantic holocaust was offered “to the God of Israel who resides in Jerusalem” by the Judeo-Babylonians who (re)colonized Palestine, in preparation for the (re)building of the Temple (7:12–15).

Strangely, it is during the Vietnam War that the term “Holocaust” became the common designation of the killing of Jews during World War II. Unless we consider that Hitler was working for the glory of Yahweh, that expression seems absurd. Surely, the anti-Zionist rabbi Moshe Shonfeld believes that “The Zionist leaders saw the spilt Jewish blood of the Holocaust as grease for the wheels of the Jewish national state.”[19]

But the term logically applies much better to the Vietnam War if we consider that by focusing the attention of the American public, then the protests of American youths and liberal intellectuals, it left the field wide open for Israel’s conquest of Palestinian, Egyptian, and Syrian territories. After all, the Vietnamese plight was greater than the Palestinians’.

This, I believe, provides a plausible answer to the question: Why did Johnson, who did not satisfy the CIA hawks on Cuba, draw the US into the Vietnam inferno? The strongest Johnson administration advocate for a deepening commitment in Vietnam was National Security Advisor Walt Rostow, whose brother Eugene was Under-Secretary of State. They happened to be sons of Jewish immigrants. The historian David Milne has called Rostow “America’s Rasputin.”

Two months after his election in 1968, Nixon secretly and illegally expanded the war into Cambodia, ordering a massive bombardment under the codename Breakfast, followed by Lunch, Dessert, Snack, Dinner and Supper—all of which led to the rise of the Khmer Rouge, an exceptionally bloody, tyrannical regime responsible for the extermination of one third of the Cambodian population. The man who pushed him in that direction was National Security Advisor Henry Kissinger, also acting as Secretary of State. Like the Rostows, Kissinger happens to be Jewish.

Many of the leading figures of the anti-war movement were also Jewish. But soon after the leaking of the Pentagon Papers by Daniel Ellsberg, with the help of Anthony Russo, Noam Chomsky and Howard Zinn (all Jewish by birth), other liberal Jewish intellectuals made a 180-degree turn and became leading advocate of the war: they called themselves “neoconservatives”.

We have here a fine example of dialectical engineering of history: as Jewish leftists like Noam Chomsky started to protest against the war, former Jewish leftists like Irving Kristol started to protest against the protesters. Meanwhile, Israel could be pushed out of the headlines.

Kristol wrote in the magazine of the American Jewish Congress in 1972 that it was necessary to fight against George McGovern’s proposal to reduce the military budget by 30 percent: “This is to drive a knife into the heart of Israel. […] Jews don’t like a big military budget, but it is now an interest of the Jews to have a large and powerful military establishment in the United States. […] American Jews who care about the survival of the state of Israel have to say, no, we don’t want to cut the military budget, it is important to keep that military budget big, so that we can defend Israel.”[20]

Against McGovern’s demand for immediate withdrawal from Vietnam, Kristol could have added: “American Jews who care about the survival of the state of Israel have to say, no, we don’t want to withdraw from Vietnam, it is important to pursue the genocide of the Vietnamese, so that America’s youthful idealists will protest against their own government rather than against Israel’s violation of international law.”

References

[1] On JFK Library, http://www.jfklibrary.org/

[2] Phillip Nelson, LBJ: The Mastermind of JFK’s Assassination, XLibris, 2010, p. 638.

[3] LBJ Library: http://www.lbjlib.utexas.edu/johnson/archives.hom/nsams/nsam273.asp.

[4] LBJ Library: http://www.lbjlib.utexas.edu/johnson/archives.hom/nsams/nsam288.asp

[5] Scott Shane, “Vietnam Study, Casting Doubts, Remain Secret”, New York Times, October 31, 2005: http://www.nytimes.com/2005/10/31/politics/31war.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0.

[6] Figures taken from “Vietnam Holocaust, 140 years of pillage, slaughter & persecution,” ã Föreningen Levande Framtid, Sweden, 2001: http://www.nnn.se/vietnam/holocaust.pdf

[7] State Department Archive: http://2001-2009.state.gov/r/pa/ho/frus/johnsonlb/xix /28057.htm.

[8] Robert Allen, Beyond Treason: Reflections on the Cover-up of the June 1967 Israeli Attack on the USS Liberty, an American Spy Ship, CreateSpace, 2012.

[9] Watch the 2014 Al-Jazeera documentary The Day Israel Attacked America.

[10] Alan Hart, Zionism: The Real Enemy of the Jews, vol. 2: David Becomes Goliath, Clarity Press, 2013, p. 250.

[11] Morris Smith, “Our First Jewish President Lyndon Johnson? – an update!!,” 5 Towns Jewish Times, April 11, 2013, on 5tjt.com.

[12] Arthur Schlesinger, A Thousand Days: John Kennedy in the White House (1965), Mariner Books, 2002, p. 56.

[13] Alan Hart, Zionism, vol. 2: op. cit., p. 257.

[14] Joan Mellen, A Farewell to Justice, Potomac Books, 2007.

[15] Charles Kaman, “Politics had reared its ugly head in a very certain way,” on http://stonezone.com/article.php?id=633

[16] Video on https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=03if1QnA5MI ; text on http://akadem.org/medias/documents/3-conference-degaulle.pdf

[17] On the Jewish-led student uprising in Paris in 1968, read Yair Auron, Les Juifs d’extrême gauche en Mai 68, Albin Michel, 1998.

[18] Watch on https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aNb1uUlG2QI .

[19] Rabbi Moshe Shonfeld, Holocaust Victims Accuse: Documents and Testimony of Jewish War Criminals, Bnei Yeshivos, 1977 (http://netureikartaru.com/Holocaust_Victims_Accuse.pdf), pp. 28, 24.

[20] Philip Weiss, “30 Years Ago, Neocons Were More Candid About Their Israel-Centered Views,” May 23, 2007: http://mondoweiss.net/2007/05/30_years_ago_ne/.

Jewish Values: Whatever is Good For the Jews

We’re always being told that Israeli’s shares our values but actually they are quite alien to universal norms. In fact, there is nothing normal about them! They serve a different purpose on this earth. Need a favor? Just ask the criminal Jews!

 

Polish priest claims Jews follow a different notion of truth

 by Gilad Atzmon
Polish priest claims Jews follow a different notion of truth…Polish Jews are upset so they issued a complaint that actually supports Zielinski’s assertion….

The Times of Israel reports today that Polish priest Henryk Zielinski, editor-in-chief of the Catholic weekly Idziemy, said during an interview with Polish TV (TVP) that Jews have “a completely different system of values, a different concept of truth.” “For us,” Zielinski said. “the truth corresponds to facts. For the Jew, truth means something that conforms to his understanding of what’s beneficial. If a Jew is religious, then truth means something God wants.”

Zielinski added that for non-religious Jews, “the truth is subjective or whatever serves Israel’s interests.” In support of his view Zielinski cited the Haggadah — a text read by Jews at the Passover Seder, which contains the story of the Exodus of the Hebrews from Egypt. “Often these stories have nothing to do with facts.”

You guessed it.  Polish Jews are very upset. Representatives of Polish Jews issued a complaint to the state’s media watchdog. The Jewish representatives didn’t argue that Zielinski was wrong. They didn’t counter his statements by asserting  that the Passover Haggadah is an accurate historical narrative.  Instead they wrote that  “Zielinski’s remarks violated the National Council of Radio and Television principles for content on public media, including its ban on ideas that ‘incite to hatred or discriminate on the grounds of race, disability, gender, religion or nationality.”

I am perplexed. Zielinski may be right or wrong. But he clearly didn’t incite hatred or discrimination against Jews or anyone else. Maybe the Polish Jewish Union should rethink the wording of their complaint because the complaint as presented in the Israeli press  actually supports Zielinski’s assertion– It is inspired not by facts but by a ‘different’ type of value system. It is duplicitous to the core. Not only does it not correspond with the truth, it is dismissive of truthfulness altogether.

 

Now 80, the youngest Schindler’s List survivor won’t STOP telling her story

gif request - exodus GIF

Tailoring, altering and radically sanitizing the history of the founding of the State of Israhell.

Lavi feels a sense of urgency in telling her story because she thinks there are groups that still seek to annihilate Jews and other minorities, she says.

Biographer takes shine off Spielberg’s Schindler

“Schindler had almost nothing to do with the list,” Professor Crowe wrote in yesterday’s New York Times. He added that Steven Spielberg was “a very wonderful, tender man _ but Schindler’s List was theater, and not in an historically accurate way.”

1921 Henry Ford:
As soon as the Jews gained control of the “movies,” we had a movie problem, the consequences of which are not yet visible.

The International Jew
— The World’s Foremost Problem

timesofisrael

One way to transmit the experience, Lavi says, is movies. She’s grateful for the research work that Spielberg did while making “Schindler’s List,” which won the Academy Award for best picture.

She remembers how her mother made her hide outside in below-zero weather, clutching a standing pipe, as Nazis searched her home in Poland. She remembers her father telling her to swallow a spoonful of cyanide — better than death at the hands of the Nazis — only to have her mother object at the last minute. She remembers seeing her twin cousins shot to death as they ran up a hill at a labor camp.

Lavi was 2 years old when Nazi Germany took over her hometown of Krakow in September 1939. Now 80, she wants to make sure her stories aren’t lost after she’s gone.

“There was no childhood for children my age,” she said in a speech to the United Nations General Assembly following International Holocaust Remembrance Day on January 27. “Regularly, we saw, heard, and understood everything the Nazis were doing to us. At 6 years old, children were cynical old people trying to survive.”

Lavi is the youngest survivor to have been on Schindler’s List, the Jews saved by German industrialist Oskar Schindler and immortalized in Steven Spielberg’s 1993 film. Lavi was put in a ghetto in Poland with her family immediately after the Nazi takeover, transferred to a labor camp, and then to Auschwitz.

After being saved by Schindler, who sheltered hundreds of Jews who worked in his kitchen goods and armament factories, Lavi lived a quiet life in Israel. She served in the army, lived on a kibbutz, worked as an administrative assistant, and raised a family. She remembers the early years in Israel when survivors were disparaged as weak and passive. But as interest in the Holocaust increased, she became more vocal in recounting her experience. Now she speaks to groups at Yad Vashem, the Israeli Holocaust authority, and travels to Poland every year with a group of high school students.

When there are no more live (fictional) story transmitters, there’s the Israel youth being being programmed by holocaust survivor holograms. They think of everything because they exist on the Holocaust  myth. Israel needs it for the $doners, financial shakedowns, and their youth to raise them up in fear and hate so that they will kill on command (and even without it).

“It’s true testimony from someone who was there. It’s not a story,” she told JTA in a separate interview last week, adding that once Israelis became interested in the Holocaust, [ when the movies came out]  “the survivors opened their mouths and began to tell the story. It’s not just a story. It’s the worst and cruelest thing that happened in the world.”

Although Lavi now regularly returns to Auschwitz, she says the experience still isn’t easy. Each time, she finds herself looking around in horror and crying. But by now she’s used to it.

“Every time I go, I cry here and there because it’s a terrible thing,” she told JTA. “Every person that went there saw the ovens, the gas chambers. Everything was real. It’s very scary, but because I’ve gone so many times, I take it differently. I don’t think about myself. I think about how the kids are reacting.”

Lavi also feels a sense of urgency in telling her story because she thinks the world hasn’t gotten better since she was liberated. There are groups that still seek to annihilate Jews and other minorities, she says.

And she called the Polish bill that will criminalize those who blame Poland for the Holocaust a “disaster.” Yes, she says, Poles were killed, too, at the Nazi death camps. But she adds that the Poles were no angels, citing Polish violence against Jews during and after the war.

“I was in Auschwitz, and there were Polish prisoners,” she said. “But what they say, that the Poles were all sweetness and light? No. In any case, they didn’t really like the Jews.”

As the Holocaust survivor population shrinks — Lavi was born just two years before the war — she sounds conflicted about how best to perpetuate Holocaust memory. On the one hand, she acknowledges that survivors’ stories are extensively documented. On the other hand, she knows nothing is more powerful than a firsthand account.

One way to transmit the experience, she says, is movies. She’s grateful for the research work that Spielberg did while making “Schindler’s List,” which won the Academy Award for best picture.

 

“Revenge Is Ours”

The World Conquerors: Chapter Nine, “Revenge Is Ours” (1958)

In 1920, returning from the unsuccessful peace·conference of Versailles, President Wilson of the United States announced openly:
“There was a secret force at work in Europe which we were unable to trace.”

ON May 9th, 1945, the revenge of Jehovah was turned loose over Europe. The planes of the British and American Air Forces were still called “liberators “, but Eisenhower announced: “We are not coming here as liberators but as conquerors.”

But were the Americans, in fact, the real victors? In the wake of the advancing American forces a sinister fifth column followed, the members of which in ninety-nine percent of cases were not Americans. This revengeful army was made up of emigrants from Eastern European countries, of black-market operators from Brooklyn ghettos, of Czech, Polish and Hungarian Jews who took refuge in London and of criminal inmates from the liberated concentration camps.

They filled all major and minor posts in the C.I.C. organised according to the Morgenthau Plan; they swarmed in the O.S.S., in the various commissions searching for war criminals, as well as in the American security organisations. They became mayors of German towns and commandants of P.O.W. camps. They administered La Guardia’s U.N.R.R.A. They occupied key positions in the American forces and thus exercised control over them.

There were only 2,524 German war criminals on the original list of the U.N., but soon the C.I.C. and the American conquerors were conducting a search for one million German “war criminals”. At first the Soviets wanted to shoot 50,000 Germans summarily, then they proposed to bring 200,000 “war criminals” to trial at Nuremberg.

Simultaneously, the conquering flood began to move eastwards. A mass of several hundred thousand released from the concentration camps surged towards Poland, Hungary, Rumania and Yugoslavia, to become officers in the Communist police forces and other terror organisations and to assume judicial powers in the people’s tribunals and so be able to pass sentence upon innocent people in an orgy of revenge. They were welcomed with open arms by the Soviet M.V.D. (115) who were in control of the Eastern European countries. The pattern was everywhere the same. In the forefront there was either an American, a Soviet or a French general but in each case a Jewish deputy dogged his heels.

Actually, Europe did not fall under the Russians, British or Americans, but under Jewish occupation. Everything that had rightly or wrongly belonged to Europe for 2,000 years now disintegrated. The avengers continued doing (but more cruelly) the very things they had set down as crimes against Hitler. This was no occupation by the forces of American democracy or Bolshevism but by those of a victorious Jewish nationalism glowing with hatred. Ensconced in key positions among the occupying powers, they were able to punish everyone, whether innocent or guilty. In their eyes there was but one crime ~ to have opposed, or to be in a position to oppose ~ Jewish nationalism.

To be a Jew in Europe became a greater privilege than any enjoyed by even reigning princes of the Middle Ages. The railway stations were guarded by special Jewish police and an identity check of Jews could be carried out by Jewish police only. They received their food ration cards without queueing. For a while, immediately after the war, only Jews received travelling passes, thus securing for themselves free movement and the unrestricted monopoly of the black market. In the refugee camps they were the chief caterers for U.N.R.R.A. as well as the privileged beneficiaries of this relief. Thus, they snatched the best rations from Poles, Ukrainians and Czechs, their former fellow-prisoners in the concentration camps. At the same time, on the roads, military policemen overturned cans and spilled milk to deprive German children and hospital patients of their diet.

In German cities, working-class families were turned out of their homes by the tens of thousands, thus rendering vacant the nicest workers’ settlements. The victims had to leave behind everything ~ furniture, kitchen equipment and cooking utensils, clothing and even linen, thus forcing the German people to recompense three times over in the form of Wiedergutmachung (reparations) the actual value of the goods confiscated from the Jews.

Uniformed Zionist guards were posted at camp gates and, at first, for a while, even the Military Police of the victorious American Army could not enter Jewish camps. Victorious Jewish nationalism was granted (116) similar rights in the East, in Slovakia, in some parts of Rumania, in Hungary and Bohemia. They took possession of the flats and furniture of the Gentiles, occupied key positions in government offices and in editorial posts of the national press. Concurrently, former Jewish journalists returned to Germany and took complete charge of the newspapers of the occupied zones, and began to incite revenge upon the German nation on its own soil.

“It is from us that the all-engulfing terror proceeds…” wrote the Protocols fifty years ago. And now, backed by Soviet and American arms, the most dreadful terror descended on Europe, often without the Americans and English being aware of it. Hitlerism and the war was finished with, but neither peace nor law and order or justice or democracy were restored.
The Western and Eastern Jew set out hand-in-hand to liquidate the Christian upper classes who had succeeded in escaping to the West from Bolshevism. These were considered unreliable people. Vlassov’s Cossacks, for instance, wanted to fight against Bolshevism. But whoever resists Bolshevism is actually fighting one section of the Jewish world-kingdom.

These Cossacks knew very well who were the commissars of the collective farms (kolkhoz) before whom the Russian peasant had to go down on his knees. In 1940, they had seen the “Russian” M.V.D. entering Latvia, Estonia and Lithuania and thus knew the Jews almost exclusively organised the deportation of tens of thousands of unfortunate people from these small Baltic states. These people were dangerous because they had witnessed certain things. These witnesses must be slain!

How can one account for the fate of Vlassov’s Cossacks otherwise than by Jewish nationalism operating behind the visible power. How else could such inhumanity be accounted for when British democracy allowed armed military police to deploy against thousands of unarmed Cossacks?
“I was calling on Vlassov,” writes Laszlo Gaal, a Hungarian journalist, “when a lieutenant wearing a German uniform and whose forehead was bathed in blood, burst into the small country cottage and reported direct to the general standing amongst his three staff officers: “‘Sir,everything is lost! We are to be handed over to the Bolsheviks!'” (117)

You who are reading this book did not see the P.O.W. camp with its fourteen feet high wire fencing and its wooden barracks. You never heard that cry of despair when the white-belted and white-helmeted military police came to hand the Cossacks over. Tear gas bombs had to be thrown into every room. The Cossacks hurriedly knotted their shirts into ropes to hang themselves before the military police could force its way in. They barricaded the doors, then broke in the windows and fought for every piece of broken glass in order to cut open their veins. Old friends tried to cut each other’s throats. Those unable to die this way tore off their shirts, offering their bared breast, shouting; “Shoot here, for I am not going back to Soviet Russia.” (Pittsburgi Magyarsag, July 2nd, 1954.) (Also Magyarok Utja, edited in Argentina.)
The clamour of the same executioners was heard throughout Europe from the English Channel to the Black Sea. It was not Nazism that had to be liquidated now, but the leaders of the Christian nations irrespective of political creed or party.

Those who rounded up “war criminals” by the ten thousand and tortured both guilty and innocent in their jails were, almost exclusively, Jews. The commandants, captains and secret agents in the jails for “war criminals” at Salzburg and other places, as well as in the notorious Marcus Camp were, almost without exception, Jews dressed in American uniform. According toa Jugoslav refugee who had been in the camp at Klagenfurt, its British Commandant, who handed over “war criminals” and compelled them by force to return to Communist dictatorship, proudly put a notice on his desk sporting the inscription “I AM A JEW!”
The Jews handed patriots over to the gallows and to the common grave. They handed over 100,000 gallant soldiers of the Croatian Army to the partisans of Tito and to Moša Pijade, who summarily executed them all.

The caves and abandoned trenches of Slovenia were utilised as common graves. Vlassov is a symbolic figure in this great tragedy, in the slaughter of millions. He was the last person capable of rallying an army of several million men under his flag against the Stalinist dictatorship. So, naturally, this symbolic personality was handed over by the Western democracies to the Bolshevik terror regime. To the Jew, Lavrentiy Beria, was given the pleasing task of organising (118) Vlassov’s public execution in Moscow. And because all this happened with the approval of America, an incurable wound was inflicted on the soul of Europe.

Everything that took place in Eastern Europe can, perhaps, be explained away by the cruelty of the Bolsheviks, although we know very well that the agents of Jewish nationalism were its real instigators. At the end of the war the casualties of the German Reich amounted to 8,300,000 dead; 3,300,000 German soldiers were killed in action; more than 2,500,000 of these in the fight against Bolshevism. 1,200,000 civilians, amongst them many women and children, were killed in air raids.

More than 1,400,000 men perished or were murdered in captivity by the Eastern and Western allies, mostly in Soviet P.O.W. camps. 2,400,000 Eastern Germans were butchered by the Soviet occupation forces invading East Prussia, or killed by an aerial warfare blindly extended to include the civilian population. To all these things hypocrites can retort: “Well, after all, this is what is called total and all-out war!” But nobody could explain away by referring to “total war” what happened in Czechoslovakia on the day of the armistice. When the last Wehrmacht units left Prague, Jewish Communists, led by Slansky-Salzman, returned from Moscow to the Czech capital where they proceeded to gather together the revengeful ex-prisoners of Hitler’s concentration camps ~ the “liberating” partisans.

“The Czech Communists made very clever use of those unfortunate Jews,” wrote Vilag on March 15th, 1953, “who came out of the extermination camps half dead. They put these Jews in charge of the expatriation of Sudeten-Germans and Hungarians. The idea was not at all new as Lavrentiy Beria did the same when he used Polish and Ukrainian Jews to hunt down the Ukrainian and Polish ‘anti-Semites’, i.e. those who could be supposed to have collaborated with the Nazis.”
And because they believed that this supposition could be extended to include nearly everybody, they began a campaign of revenge unprecedented in the history of mankind.

When Edvard Beneš, the great humanitarian, the “bel espirit” and master of freemasonry entered Prague on Sunday, May 13th, 1945, German citizens were burned alive in his honour in St. Wenceslas Square. (Document No. 15 concerning the expulsion of the Sudeten Germans.) Many Germans were hung up by their feet from the big (119) advertising posters in St. Wenceslas Square, then when the great humanitarian approached their petrol-soaked bodies were set on fire to form living torches.

Six hundred thousand Sudeten Germans were killed during the massacres in the earthly hell of the death camps of Czechoslovakia. The Sudeten German White Paper records these horrors with full details on more than 1,000 pages, horrors for which there is no precedent in the history of mankind. Armed Czech women and Jewesses continued hitting the womb of expectant mothers with truncheons until a miscarriage followed, and in one single camp ten German women died daily in this way. (Document No. 6.) In another camp, the inmates were forced to lick up the bespattered brains of their fellow-prisoners who had been beaten to death. German prisoners were forced to lick up infectious feces from the underwear of their fellow-prisoners suffering from dysentery. (Document No. 17.) The Czech and Jewish doctors refused all medical aid to German women raped by the Russians. Hundreds of thousands died by these means or sought salvation in suicide, as, for instance, in Brno (Brun), where on a single day 275 women committed suicide.

Naturally, the Western” humanitarian” press, the American radio network and the B.B.C. commentators took good care never to mention these facts, although they themselves were in the first place responsible for this campaign of revenge to which they instigated the members of their own nations. They were thus guilty of poisoning the soul of Christendom by the hatred they induced.
But Czechoslovakia was not the first state where horrors of this type occurred. Ana Rabinovich Pauker returned to Rumania as early as August, 1944, and under the orders of the Eastern Jews who arrived with her, massacres began there too.

According to authentic Bulgarian emigrant sources, 30,000 members of the professional classes were murdered in the trail of the invading Soviet armies by Bulgarian “proletarians”, led by those “ladines” whose forefathers had been expelled from Spain by Catholic Ferdinand. Similarly, in Belgrade and Southern Hungary the name of Moša Pijade is connected with bloody “purges” the victims of which were Serbian intelligentsia, prosperous German settlers and the most intelligent Hungarian peasantry. When, in October, 1944, the German and Hungarian armies left the territories of Yugoslavia (120) and Southern Hungary an unprecedented wave of mass-murders broke over the unprotected population. Thirty thousand Hungarians, mostly peasants and smallholders, died in this bloodshed, under the savage terror regime of Moša Pijade’s partisans.

The Katyn Wood murders are a modest, amateurish effort in comparison with it. According to documentary proof in our hands, Hungarians, Germans and Croatians alike, died slow and horrible deaths wracked with agony. Besides the 30,000 Hungarians, nearly 200,000 Germans died in the death camps of the “liberators”, where powdered glass was mixed with the children’s food and where with the finesse of Chinese executioners those to perish in the biological class-warfare were dispatched, in order that their places as civic leaders and police officers could be taken by the revengeful representatives of Jehovah.

In this classic age of race murder, the case of Hungary is quite extraordinary. This unfortunate nation, even in its dismembered state after the 1920 Parish treaties, had provided 560,000 Jews with peaceful and safe homes. The Hungarian nation did not take vengeance on Jewry even after the first Communist dictatorship of Bela Kun in 1919-1920, despite the fact that Jews, almost exclusively, were the commissars and leaders of this Communist régime.

During the era between the two World Wars, 1,100,000 acres were owned by Jews out of a total of 9,000,000 acres of arable land. A Jewish minority of six percent possessed fifty-one percent of house property in Budapest, thirty percent of the total national income and twenty-five percent of the total national assets. When, after the German occupation, the state authorities listed the property and assets of Jewry amassed in less than a hundred years, it was estimated that it possessed the equivalent of nineteen wagon loads of gold, silver and jewels, whilst the total gold reserve of the Hungarian National Bank could have been loaded into twelve wagons easily. Later, the American authorities returned all this amassed wealth to Jewry.

As late as 1943, Hungary was the last refuge of the Jews in Europe. Despite this, when the war was over and the country overrun by Stalin’s hordes, the revengeful spirit of The Old Testament inflicted horrors on the innocent Hungarian people without precedent in the history of mankind. Under the protection of Soviet bayonets the Muscovite emigrants returned, all of them Jews without exception. (121) Closely behind them followed many thousands of young Maccabees, released unharmed from the labour divisions of the “Fascist” regime. They soon became terrorist colonels and police officers of the M.V.D., as well as party secretaries and police chiefs of the provincial cities. From the ghettos of Budapest 200,000 Jews were released almost without loss ~ Jews whom the Hungarian Nazis had been unwilling to hand over to the Germans.

One million Hungarian women were raped by the Russian Bolshevik troops, usually led by Jewish commandants. Six hundred thousand prisoners of war, as well as 230,000 civilians, were dragged off to extermination camps in the Soviet Union. At the most modest estimate, 500,000 people were murdered by the Jews in the cells of 60, Andrássy út, Budapest, in internment camps or in the open streets. All the characteristic features of biological class-warfare can be distinguished in this campaign of revenge. The Hungarian middle classes, the intellectuals and the national leaders had to be slain so that their places could be taken by another middle-class by the Jews! And, moreover, those who presided as judges in the revolutionary tribunals were almost all Jews.

In Western Europe, a Hungarian-born “American”, Colonel Martin Himmler, directed the campaign of vengeance against 300,000 Hungarians who escaped from the Bolsheviks. Was this man a Communist? Or was he an American democrat? At all events, in its issue of April 30th, 1954, the Uj Kelet (New Orient), a Zionist Tel-Aviv paper, let the cat out of the bag ~ he was neither; he was a Jew!
In the commentary reviewing Martin Himmler’s work and career he is highly praised as one who came forward to “revenge the shedding of innocent Jewish blood”.

One wonders whether Cardinal Mindszenty was also “a Hungarian Nazi murderer” who during the war rescued and protected persecuted Jews, and who after the war tried to protect and rescue persecuted Christians. Cardinal József Mindszenty was not a victim of the Communist terror but of racial revenge, because be had demanded an amnesty for tens of thousands of tortured Hungarians during the great massacres and gruesome pogroms directed against Christians.

Jozsef Mindszenty in his earlier capacity as Bishop of Veszprem, vehemently opposed the Hungarian Nazi Government of the day. (122) He rescued Jews whom the Germans wanted to deport by giving them Papal safe conduct passes. After the Szalasi Government came to power he protested against continuing the fighting. In the end the Hungarian Nazi Government was compelled to intern him at Sopronkohida as an enemy of the Germans and the greatest protector of Jewry.

Shortly after that the tables were turned. The armies of the Soviet barbarians occupied Hungary. Jozsef Mindszenty was released from captivity at Sopronkohida and as Archbishop of Hungary, rapidly became one of the leading constitutional figures.
Whatever his private political views may have been, he felt that, asa Catholic and leading exponent of Christianity, it was his duty to protect Hungarians against Jewish persecution, just as he had protected Jews against German persecution. In his letter written to Ferenc Nagy, Prime Minister after 1945, he pointed out clearly that “anti-Semitism” could only be successfully eradicated were “war criminals” to be granted a general amnesty and were the campaign of revenge against the Hungarian nation to be called off forthwith.
From this moment Jozsef Mindszenty, Cardinal of Hungary, who wished to check the campaign of revenge against the Hungarian people, became an “anti-Semite”.

Peter Fuerst, a Zionist writer, made murderous accusations against him. According to Fuerst, it was generally known in Budapest that Cardinal Mindszenty was an “anti-Semite”. The printed “anti-Semitic” leaflet edited by him was in the possession of the Jewish Centre at Budapest. During the Mindszenty Trials several Jewish organisations asked if it were a fact that Mindszenty was known in the West as “pro-Semitic”. Bertha Gaster, correspondent of the London News Chronicle, met Cardinal Mindszenty. During one of her interviews, Gaster was surprised to hear the Cardinal using strong terms concerning the conduct of Hungarian Jewry. At the end of the interview Miss Gaster rose, thanked him for the statements he had made, but, at the same time, let him know that she was a Jewess herself and an active member of the London Jewish Community. The Jewish Clarion of February 1949, asserted that Jozsef Mindszenty was, in fact, a notorious “anti-Semite” because he demanded an amnesty for “war criminals”. (123)

At the same time the Jewish Chronicle wrote in its issue of February 4th, 1949: “Hungarian Jewish organisations have learned with great surprise that Western Jewish organisations took the side of Mindszenty, whom these statements show up as the arch-enemy of Hungarian and East European Jewry.”
It was enough to brand the “pro-Semitic” Mindszenty, who saved the lives of many thousands of Jews, with “anti-Semitism” for the most sinister campaign of revenge to start against him immediately. The hatred of Eastern Jews was picked up by Western Jews so that soon, from both East and West alike a campaign was in progress against a Christian high priest whose only “crime” was to remain human and to raise his voice against the persecution of his own people.

It was Mátyás Rákosi-Roth, the Communist dictator, who entered the lists against him, whilst “ideologically” this campaign was led by Jozsef Revai, Minister of Education, whose real name was Moses Kahana. Amongst his own priests who betrayed him the first was Istvan Balogh ~ alias Izrael Bloch. Those who produced faked evidence were Ivan Boldizsar, alias Bettelheim, a press chief; Reissman, chief of the publicity department, and Gera, alias Grunsweig, deputy propaganda chief. Hanna and Laszlo Sulner who prepared “his” forged manuscripts were also Jews.
Colonel Kraftanov, the Soviet hangman, was brought specially from Moscow. Benjamin Perer-Auspitz, the chief interrogator, put him through the third degree; the Jew Karpati-Krausz, a wrestling champion, was his torturer; Imre Zipszer, the Jewish prison governor, sat next to him all the time, even during the court hearings; and finally, Balassa-Blaustein and Emil Weil administered stupefactive drugs to him.

The Primate of Hungary and the protector of Jewry thus became the victim of the Jews because he wished to prevent a campaign of revenge against his nation.
About this time, even such a well-known Communist as László Rajk, whose first wife was of Jewish origin, fell victim to the same tribal “Nazism”. He used abusive language about the Jewish descent of Ernő Gerő Singer, Chief Communist Commissar in the 1936 Spanish Civil War and from this moment he was considered an “anti-Semite”. It was in vain that he helped to murder the best (124) part of the Hungarian ideological elite when he was Minister of the Interior. During a party conference he frankly told Mátyás Rákosi-Roth that “Communism would not spread because there were too many Jews amongst its leaders”. From that moment his doom was sealed. He ended his ignominious life on Rakosi’s gallows.

The great Hungarian patriot László Endre, who finished his life on the gallows of tribal “Nazism”, wrote the exact truth in his farewell letter of March 21st, 1946, the day of his martyrdom. “The contents of the Protocols of the Elders of Zion are true. The means are in their hands by now to accomplish world-hegemony and they will destroy everything that might impede them in building this new world state. Therefore all that is now happening concerns in no way the administration of justice but only prevention and revenge. This entails the destruction of not only those who have done something, but also of those who might do or could have done something.”
All these cases so far reported concerned defeated states. But let us see whether the position was any better in the states which won the war after sacrificing the lives and blood of their sons and risking their very existence.

Neither Germany nor her allies were the first victims of the revenge of Jehovah but rather victorious France, where, after the departure of the German troops, the fateful purge started. The blood bath of the Commune of Paris in 1871 was nothing in comparison to what took place in victorious France during the summer of 1944. Twenty thousand French lives were lost during the terror regime of the Great French Revolution; eighteen thousand French people died on the barricades of the Commune of Paris. But now one hundred and fifty thousand French citizens perished in more horrible circumstances than ever before.

During the Great French Revolution there was at least some pretence of trial by courts or tribunals. But in 1944, French people were shot dead like rabbits. The victims of the Great French Revolution, the Dantons and the others, were at least able to mount the stairs to the guillotine with straight features and an unimpaired body. But in 1944, fifty percent of these French victims were half dead from torture before being killed. Their bodies were lacerated, their nails plucked out with pincers and their flesh burned by red-hot irons or cigarette butts. Behind General de Gaulle (125) a Polish Jew called Thomas, one of the leaders of the Spanish Red Brigade, was the chief perpetrator of these monstrosities. He organised common criminals from the jails together with ex-prisoners from the concentration camps into storm-troops to wreak vengeance.

“The whole massacre was brought about by the propaganda of Jews on the B.B.C.,” wrote the German paper Der Weg, “who let loose the bloodthirsty devils of revenge.” “Nazi collaborators” were not primarily the victims of these massacres, but peasants with large farms and the French intellectual elite.
In Belgium and the Netherlands, the same retribution continued, though with more regard to preserve some kind of semblance of legal formality. The charge of “collaboration” was brought against 480,519 people and out of these 1,208 were sentenced to death. All those who volunteered for work in Germany were convicted.

The basic motives of this campaign of revenge were not only induced by the terrible sight of the ruins but also by the guilty conscience of Jewry. The real war criminals had a foreboding that one day they might be called upon to render an account for what they had done in planning the war as well as for its barbarism. They had to produce an even greater criminal. To justify their revenge they had to find something apparently even more horrible than the 300,000 dead bodies of Dresden or the Katyn Wood murders or the massacres of Bromberg, which could be used as an eyewash to mislead public opinion.

The massacres of 1945, on the other hand, could not be justified by anything else than by the magnification several hundred times over of cruelties committed by the Germans. Not only revenge as such had to be justified, but the post-war attitude of Jewry itself, which shocked a good many members of the Jewish community.

Sussmanovics, a Soviet Jew, Commandant of Budapest in 1945, summoned the author, Gizella Molinary, to his office and said to her: “Why bother me with your complaint that you are ignored and let down by your former Jewish friends? Look down on the street from my window here! The war is still raging; the Red Armies have not yet reached the outskirts of Vienna. In the German concentration camps belated efforts are being made to exterminate the Jews, yet ~ look out of this window and see what is going on down there in the street! The Jews here have little thought for their brothers pleading for their lives in distant countries.

Have any of them any intention (126) of fighting to save them? On the ruins of gutted and burned shops, in the doorways of houses and even on graves, the small pair of scales and a big poster appear: ‘Gold is bought and sold’, says the poster. Here, the soldier throws away his rifle and the writer his pen for everyone is sitting on graves buying and selling gold. Why do you look at me like that? Because I am aware of these things? Of course I am! I am a Jew myself and I am filled with bitter rage and contrition.” (From In the Shadow of the Mindszenty Trials by Aladar Kovach, page 131.)

A special technique of psychological terror had to be employed, therefore, to cover up all these things. Quite a number of Jewish witnesses gave evidence at Nuremberg that though they lived in the vicinity of crematoria they were not aware of their existence. Nevertheless, radio commentators and judges taunted the German people with: “You all knew of these! You are all murderers!” If anyone, even a bishop or a cardinal, tried to raise a word of protest and state the truth, he was silenced with the threat of “Nazi”! Perhaps he was also threatened with being handed over to the Russians. Thus not only the German people but the whole of cultured Europe was intimidated. Thus a stage was reached when nobody dared to tell the truth or state the basic facts forfear of appearing to defend murder and atrocities.
The foul propaganda campaign brought about a state of affairs in which the lie appeared as the truth, revenge as administration of justice and a truthful utterance as a condonation of war crimes.

This propaganda tried to convince the ill-informed Gentile masses that the Jews were the only victims of this war and that no other nations suffered any losses whatever. It remained silent about the common graves dug for ten millions of Gentile victims and not a word was said about the massacred Hungarians, Rumanians, Bulgarians and Frenchmen. At the same time the story of Jewry’s sufferings was exaggerated beyond all measure. In so doing, the privileges enjoyed by Jews in U.N.R.R.A. and I.R.O., as occupation authorities, in receiving the lion’s share of the food rations and in holding the black market monopoly, were also justified.

Thus they attempted to justify the outrage of handing over the elite of Central Europe to the Soviets ~ or those of them they had not murdered themselves.
A new age had now dawned in which Jewry could escape the (127) consequences of any deed, however dastardly, and the whole of Christian Europe became a happy hunting ground for Jewry’s revenge. It was enough to speak Hungarian in the streets of Munich to be immediately picked up and handed over to the Communist hangman by the Military Police, whom the Jewish executioners called in promptly. Thus an atmosphere was created in which the allied military authorities not only became unable to check Jewry’s revengeful excesses, but also in which their own existence was jeopardised if they showed any reluctance to offer themselves as instruments of Jewry’s aims.

What, in fact, happened in Europe between 1945 and 1950 was nothing else but an uncanny materialisation of the prophecies of the “forged” Protocols.
In this way the victorious Western allies lost their independence. And in the shadow of the National Flags associated with Magna Carta, the Declaration of Independence and the Code Napoleon, the Nuremberg Trials began. (128)

Israel’s use of biological weapons in 1948

Why Israel does not abide by these internationally recognised agreements is obvious. It must have stocks of weapons that are generally considered “illegal” and therefore does not want to sign its own “arrest warrant” so to say. It also does not want any international body meddling in what it considers its own “domestic affairs” in the Palestinian Territories.

The recent opening of archive material clearly demonstrates that Israel used biological weapons against the Palestinian population back in 1948. Israel to this day does not abide by internationally recognised agreements on the use of such weapons. The US imperialists turn a blind eye to all this, as they have their own “weapons of mass destruction”.
The Palestinian historian Salman Abu-Sitta, has written a very interesting article under the title: “Israel’s Dark History revealed”, that deals with an unknown episode of the 1948 war. This article proves that the Israeli ruling elite used biological weapons even before the state of Israel was created, under the nose of the British imperialists in the last days of the mandate. The Zionist ruling class of course denies this. However, the shooting of over 4 million exploding bombs on the civilian population during the recent war in Lebanon has revealed the extent of the barbarism of the rulers of the Israeli state and what they are capable of. The inhuman cruelty that was unleashed back in 1948 against the civilian population was first denied but later on revealed as being true by Zionist historian Benni Morris gives credibility to the latest research. The following is a summary of this article.
Poisoning Acre’s water supply
In the wake of Haifa’s occupation on 23 April 1948 by the Zionists, under the nose of the British Mandate forces commended by General Stockwell, Acre was attacked. The Zionists besieged the city from the land side, and started showering the population with a hail of mortar bombs day and night. Famous for its historical walls, Acre could stand the siege for some time. The city water supply came from a nearby village, Kabri, about 10kms to the north, through an aqueduct. The Zionists injected typhoid into the aqueduct at some intermediate point which passed through Zionist settlements. [see map]
The story can now be told, thanks to the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) files which have become available, 50 years after the event. A series of reports, under the reference G59/1/GC, G3/82, sent by ICRC delegate de Meuron from 6 May to about 19 May 1948, describe the conditions of the city population, struck by a sudden typhoid epidemic, and the efforts to combat it.
Of particular importance are the minutes of an emergency conference that was held at the Lebanese Red Cross Hospital in Acre on 6 May, to deal with the typhoid epidemic. The meeting was attended by Brigadier Beveridge, Chief of British Medical Services and Colonel Bonnet of the British Army, Dr Maclean of the Medical Services, Mr de Meuron, ICRC delegate in addition to other officials of the city. The minutes stated that there were at least 70 known civilian casualties; others may not have been reported. It was determined that the infection was “water borne”, not due to crowded or unhygienic conditions as claimed by the Israelis. It was decided that a substitute water supply should come from artesian wells or from the agricultural station, just north of Acre [see map], not from the aqueduct. Water chlorine solution was applied, inoculation of civil population started, movement of civil population was controlled (lest refugees heading north towards Lebanon might carry the typhoid epidemic with them, as intended by the Zionists).
In his other reports, de Meuron mentioned 55 casualties among British soldiers, who were spirited away to Port Said for hospitalisation. General Stockwell arranged for de Meuron to fly on a military plane to Jerusalem to fetch medicine. The British, who left Palestine in the hands of the Jews, did not want another embarrassing incident to delay their departure.
Brigadier Beveridge told de Meuron that this was “the first time this happened in Palestine”. This belies the Israeli story, including that of the Israeli historian Benny Morris, that the epidemic was due to “unhygienic conditions” of the refugees. If that was so, how come there was an almost equal number of casualties among British soldiers? Why did such conditions not cause epidemics in such other concentrations of refugees, under far worse conditions, in Jaffa, Lydda, Nazareth and Gaza?
ICRC delegate, de Meuron admired greatly the heroic efforts of the Arab doctors, Al-Dahhan and Al-Araj from the Lebanese Red Cross hospital in Acre, Dr Dabbas from Haifa and Mrs Bahai from Haifa.
The city of Acre, now burdened by the epidemic, became easy prey to the Zionists. They intensified their bombardment. Trucks carrying loudspeakers proclaimed, “Surrender or commit suicide. We will destroy you to the last man.”.
This episode, which started with poisoning Acre’s water supply and ended with the collapse of the city, the depopulation of its inhabitants, and its occupation continued in other places.
Gaza poisoning
Two weeks later, after their “success” in Acre, the Zionists struck again. This time in Gaza, where hundreds of thousands of refugees had gathered after their villages in southern Palestine had been occupied. The end however was different.
The following cable was sent from the commander of the Egyptian Forces in Palestine to General Headquarters in Cairo:
“15.20 hrs, 24 May [1948] Our Intelligence forces captured two Jews, David Horeen and David Mizrahi, loitering around army positions. They were interrogated and confessed they had been sent by Officer Moshe to poison the army [and the peoples’] water supply. They carried with them water bottles divided in the middle. The top part has potable water and the bottom part has a liquid contaminated with typhoid and dysentery, equipped with a rear opening from which the liquid can be released. They confessed they were members of a 20-strong team sent from Rehovot for the same purpose. Both have written their confession in Hebrew and signed it. We have taken the necessary medical precautions.”
Cholera in Egypt and Syria
The summer of 1947 was hot with diplomatic activity. The United Nations Special Committee on Palestine (UNSCOP) was busy touring Palestine and the Arab countries in order to propose the partition of Palestine such that the new Jewish immigrants to Palestine, who controlled only six per cent of Palestine under the British Mandate, be given a big chunk of Palestine (which later turned out to be 54 per cent) in order to establish a foreign state in the midst of Arab land.
The Arabs, still under the tutelage of Britain, were debating how to resist the Western-supported scheme to take away their land. The forces to reckon with were neighbouring countries with common borders with Palestine. Lebanon was weak. Trans-Jordan was still controlled directly by the British and King Abdullah was conciliatory to the Jews. This left Egypt, the stronger Arab country and Syria, recently freed from the clutches of the French Mandate. Syria was the centre of Arab resistance to the foreign occupation of Palestine. Training centres were established in Qatana to prepare Arab volunteers to enter Palestine under the banner of “The Arab Rescue Army”. Egypt and Palestine were thus the most important targets.
In his 220-page continually updated report, entitled: Bioterrorism and Biocrimes: The Illicit Use of Biological Agents since 1900, dated February 2001, Dr W Seth Carus of the Center for Counterproliferation Research, National Defence University, Washington, DC, lists the following subtitle, p.87: Case 1947-01: “Zionist” Terrorists 1947-1948.
Under this section, he mentions that the cholera outbreaks in Syria and Egypt received extensive attention in the international press. The first report about the cholera in Egypt was published in The Times of London on 26 September, 1947, p4. By the time the final cases appeared in January 1948, 10,262 people had died.
He also states that the outbreak in Syria was much smaller. It was limited to two towns, about 60 kilometres south of Damascus, i.e. close to the Palestinian border. The first report appeared in the New York Times on 22 December, 1947, p5.
The Syrian army formed a cordon sanitaire and the casualties were limited to 44, including 18 deaths. Soon after, the Beirut French-language newspaper, Orient, reported that several Zionist agents, who employed cholera to disrupt the mobilisation of the volunteers’ army, were arrested. Their destiny is unknown.
These incidents, together with the Gaza poisoning, Carus states, were described in the AHC complaint to the UN and quotes the report in saying that: “The Jews plan to use this inhuman weapon against the Arabs in the Middle East in their war of extermination.”
Carus adds information from other sources about the Gaza poisoning. Rachel Katzman, Horeen’s sister, Carus stated, said: “I met one of [my brother’s] commanders in a lecture in Jerusalem. I asked him whether my brother had really attempted to poison wells. ‘These were the weapons we had’, he said, ‘and that’s that.'”
Carus also adds another source about the Acre poisoning: This source sates, “This account also claims that the Israelis poisoned the water supply of the Arab town of Acre, causing a major outbreak, and other Arab villages to prevent the villagers from returning, citing military historian Uri Milstein as a source” [Wendy Barnaby, The Plague Makers: The Secret World of Biological Warfare, London, Vision Paperbacks, 1997, pp114-116].
How did Ben Gurion start all this?
On the fourth of March 1948, Ben Gurion wrote a letter to Ehud Avriel, one of the Jewish Agency operatives in Europe, ordering him to recruit East European Jewish scientists who could “either increase [our] capacity to kill masses or to cure masses; both are important”. This truncated quotation is given by Avner Cohen who cited an author in Ben Gurion Research Centre at Sdeh Boker.
In the 1940s, Ben Gurion gathered around him Ernst David Bergmann, Avraham Marcus (Marek) Klingberg (from the Red Army) and the brothers Aharon and Ephraim Katachalsky (Katzir) – all experts in microbiology. They formed the nucleus of the Science Corps in the Haganah during the British Mandate. Ephraim Katachalsky was named commander of this new unit, renamed HEMED, in May 1948. A dispute arose between Chaim Weizmann who wished to establish a scientific institute for “clean” science, while Ben Gurion insisted on building a “dirty” centre for biological weapons. Both got their wishes realised. Weizmann Institute for scientific research was built in Rehovot. A new unit within HEMED, devoted to biological weapons and named HEMED BEIT, was formed as a branch of the Israeli Army. Its head was Alexander Keynan, a microbiologist from the medical school at the Hebrew University in Jerusalem.
With the depopulation of 530 Palestinian towns and villages in Al-Nakba in 1948, many buildings and homes became vacant and over half of the Jewish immigrants in the 1950s were housed in them. The Chief of Staff Yigal Yadin selected a home for the new biological weapons development unit in a mansion located within a large orange grove west of Nes Ziona. This unit, publicly known as Israel Institute for Biological Research (IIBR), is still there today.
Chasing the culprits.
Sara Leibovitz-Dar is a persistent investigative journalist. The trauma experienced by her parents in their native Lithuania left an indelible mark on her. She abhorred injustice and, particularly, the meek acceptance of it. She investigated the Gaza and Acre poisoning and shooting down of the civilian Libyan aircraft. The Israeli military historian, Uri Milstein, identified for her the names of the officers responsible for biological crimes.
In 1993, Sara tried to interview the commander who was responsible for the Acre poisoning. He refused to talk. “Why do you look for troubles that took place 45 years ago?” he asked. “I know nothing about this. What would you gain by publishing?”
Again, Sara interviewed the officer responsible for the Gaza poisoning. He refused to respond, “You will not get answers on these questions. Not from me and not from anyone.” Sara was persistent. She asked Colonel Shlomo Gur, former HEMED chief, whether he was aware of the secret operations in 1948. “We heard about the typhoid epidemics in Acre and about the Gaza operations. There were many rumours but I did not know whether they were true or not,” he responded.
Sara published her findings in Hadashot under the title “Microbes in State Service”, on 13 August, 1993, pp6-10. Sara, who now moved to Ha’aretz, concluded with the following comment: “What was done then with deep conviction and zealotry is now concealed with shame.”
The above documented facts show that the Zionist ruling class has had no qualms in the past about using biological weapons on civilian populations. This did not stop it from pointing the accusing finger at the old Saddam Hussein regime, of spreading panic about the imminent threat of a terrible unleashing of these weapons. And yet it had been responsible for the use of such weapons long before Saddam Hussein used them on unarmed civilians in his own country.
This is the same hypocrisy of the US ruling class. They go around the world telling countries if they can or cannot have nuclear weapons, pointing to the dangers of such weapons. But they conveniently ignore the fact that so far in history the only ruling class to have ever used these weapons on innocent civilians was precisely the US ruling class back in 1945.
It is not a mere detail that Israel has to this day signed but not ratified the Chemical Weapons Convention. It also does not participate in the Biological Weapons Convention. Israel also does not allow the application of the Fourth Geneva Convention in the West Bank and Gaza, as the rest of the world does.
Article 147 of the Geneva Convention states that to “willingly cause [civilians] great suffering or serious injury to body or health” is a “grave breach”, and which, according to Article 146, requires all “High Contracting Parties” to “search for persons alleged to have committed or to have ordered to commit such grave breaches” and must also “bring such person regardless of their nationality before their own courts”.
Why Israel does not abide by these internationally recognised agreements is obvious. It must have stocks of weapons that are generally considered “illegal” and therefore does not want to sign its own “arrest warrant” so to say. It also does not want any international body meddling in what it considers its own “domestic affairs” in the Palestinian Territories.
As if that were not enough, the major imperialist powers, headed by the US, also pick and choose who can have nuclear weapons. Israel is known to have nuclear capability but nothing is done to stop this. As usual, it isn’t based on what weapons you have but whose friend you are. If you are a friend of the US imperialists, and do their bidding, then you can get away with it. If for some reason you enter into a conflict of interest with imperialism, in particular US imperialism, then you are risking bombing and invasion. Thus Israel and other regimes that have nuclear weapons, “weapons of mass destruction”, biological weapons and so on are left alone. But Serbia, then Iraq get bombed, and other countries get bullied.
All this goes to show that it is not at all about making the world a safer place to live. No, it is about controlling regions, sources of raw materials, and spheres of influence. The real danger to the people of this planet are not small, relatively weak, powers that may occasionally enter into conflict with the fundamental interests of imperialism. The danger comes from the main imperialist powers, who are prepared to go to any length to defend their interests. The plight of the Palestinian people, the terrible fate that has met the Iraqi people, and so on are sufficient testimony to this.
Anyone who want a world where the poisoning of water supplies with typhoid, or the dropping of massive atom bombs, are relegated to a dim and distant barbaric past, must understand that this can only become reality if the class society we live in is removed. Only when ordinary working people everywhere have real control, have real power in their hands, will the world become really a safe place to live. That is why the patient, painstaking work in all countries on the part of genuine socialists to build a political force that can lead the working class everywhere to power, is not a utopian pipedream. It is the only real, worthwhile activity that we can engage in. The world can be changed and must be changed.