This propaganda of pogroms—“thousands upon thousands of Jews killed”—amounts to nothing except as it illustrates the gullibility of the press. No one believes this propaganda, and governments regularly disprove it. But the fact that it continues indicates that something besides facts is necessary to keep the scheme going.- Henry Ford
The Israeli State did not yet exist. The vast bulk of “evidence” at the Nuremberg trials was
provided by the Jews of Russia .
About the author of this article provided by Morris
There are documented orders given by Hitler preventing massacres of Jews. Irving provides documented facts from which the reader cannot avoid this conclusion. I will avoid the story of how this came to be, but, yes, you guessed it, it was the Zionists. You simply cannot say anything that alters their propagandistic picture of history.
In the aftermath of a war, history cannot be written. The losing side has no one to speak for it.Historians on the winning side are constrained by years of war propaganda that demonized the enemy while obscuring the crimes of the righteous victors.
People want to enjoy and feel good about their victory, not learn that their side was responsible for the war or that the war could have been avoided except for the hidden agendas of their own leaders. Historians are also constrained by the unavailability of information.
To hide mistakes, corruption, and crimes, governments lock up documents for decades.Memoirs of participants are not yet written.Diaries are lost or withheld from fear of retribution.
It is expensive and time consuming to locate witnesses, especially those on the losing side, and to convince them to answer questions.
Any account that challenges the “happy account” requires a great deal of confirmation from official documents, interviews, letters, diaries, and memoirs, and even that won’t be enough.
For the history of World War II in Europe, these documents can be spread from New Zealand and Australia across Canada and the US through Great Britain and Europe and into Russia.
A historian on the track of the truth faces long years of strenuous investigation and development of the acumen to judge and assimilate the evidence he uncovers into a truthful picture of what transpired. The truth is always immensely different from the victor’s war propaganda.
Truth is seldom welcomed.David Irving, without any doubt the best historian of the European part of World War II, learned at his great expense that challenging myths does not go unpunished.Nevertheless, Irving persevered.
David Irving files a libel suit in the UK against Lipstadt and Penguin Books, publisher of Denying The Holocaust, after claiming that his Goebbels biography was turned down by US publishers following the publication of the book.
If you want to escape from the lies about World War II that still direct our disastrous course, you only need to study two books by David Irving: Hitler’s War and the first volume of his Churchill biography, Churchill’s War: The Struggle for Power .
Irving is the historian who spent decades tracking down diaries, survivors, and demanding release of official documents. He is the historian who found the Rommel diary and Goebbles’ diaries, the historian who gained entry into the Soviet archives, and so on.He is familiar with more actual facts about the second world war than the rest of the historians combined.
The famous British military historian, Sir John Keegan, wrote in the Times Literary Supplement: “Two books stand out from the vast literature of the Second World War: Chester Wilmot’s The Struggle for Europe, published in 1952, and David Irving’s Hitler’s War.
Despite many such accolades, today Irving is demonized and has to publish his own books.
I will avoid the story of how this came to be, but, yes, you guessed it, it was the Zionists.You simply cannot say anything that alters their propagandistic picture of history.
In what follows, I am going to present what is my impression from reading these two magisterial works.Irving himself is very scant on opinions.He only provides the facts from official documents, recorded intercepts, diaries, letters and interviews.
World War II was Churchill’s War, not Hitler’s war.Irving provides documented facts from which the reader cannot avoid this conclusion.
Churchill got his war, for which he longed, because of the Versailles Treaty that stripped Germany of German territory and unjustly and irresponsibly imposed humiliation on Germany.
Hitler and Nationalist Socialist Germany (Nazi stands for National Socialist German Workers’ Party) are the most demonized entities in history. Any person who finds any good in Hitler or Germany is instantly demonized.The person becomes an outcast regardless of the facts.
“History is a constantly growing tree – the more you know, the more documents become available, the more you learn, and I have learned a lot since 1989,” the BBC reported him saying.
Irving is very much aware of this. Every time his factual account of Hitler starts to display a person too much different from the demonized image, Irving throws in some negative language about Hitler.
Similarly for Winston Churchill.Every time Irving’s factual account displays a person quite different from the worshiped icon, Irving throws in some appreciative language.
This is what a historian has to do to survive telling the truth.
To be clear, in what follows, I am merely reporting what seems to me to be the conclusion from the documented facts presented in these two works of scholarship.I am merely reporting what I understand Irving’s research to have established.You read the books and arrive at your own conclusion.
World War II was initiated by the British and French declaration of war on Germany, not by a surprise blitzkrieg from Germany. The utter rout and collapse of the British and French armies was the result of Britain declaring a war for which Britain was unprepared to fight and of the foolish French trapped by a treaty with the British, who quickly deserted their French ally, leaving France at Germany’s mercy.
Germany’s mercy was substantial. Hitler left a large part of France and the French colonies unoccupied and secure from war under a semi-independent government under Petain.For his service in protecting a semblance of French independence, Petain was sentenced to death by Charles de Gaulle after the war for collaboration with Germany, an unjust charge.
In Britain, Churchill was out of power.He figured a war would put him back in power.No Britisher could match Churchill’s rhetoric and orations.Or determination. Churchill desired power, and he wanted to reproduce the amazing military feats of his distinguished ancestor, the Duke of Marlborough, whose biography Churchill was writing and who defeated after years of military struggle France’s powerful Sun King, Louis XIV, the ruler of Europe.
In contrast to the British aristocrat, Hitler was a man of the people.He acted for the German people.The Versailles Treaty had dismembered Germany. Parts of Germany were confiscated and given to France, Belgium, Denmark, Poland, and Czechoslovakia.
As Germany had not actually lost the war, being the occupiers of foreign territory when Germany agreed to a deceptive armistice, the loss of approximately 7 million German people to Poland and Czechoslovakia, where Germans were abused, was not considered a fair outcome.
Hitler’s program was to put Germany back together again.He succeeded without war until it came to Poland.
Dated 1902. We have heard the story of “False Cry of Wolf”, “6 million Jewish Holocaust” is a similar story being told since 1899, only difference is, that, in this story, there was never any wolf, only Rothschild’s desire to have possession of Palestine and Jewish homeland ‘Israel’ .
Hitler’s demands were fair and realistic, but Churchill, financed by the Focus Group with Jewish money, put such pressure on British prime minister Chamberlain that Chamberlain intervened in the Polish-German negotiations and issued a British guarantee to the Polish military dictatorship should Poland refuse to release German territory and populations.
The British had no way of making good on the guarantee, but the Polish military dictatorship lacked the intelligence to realize that.Consequently, the Polish Dictatorship refused Germany’s request.
From this mistake of Chamberlain and the stupid Polish dictatorship, came the Ribbentrop/Molotov agreement that Germany and the Soviet Union would split Poland between themselves.
When Hitler attacked Poland, Britain and the hapless French declared war on Germany because of the unenforceable British guarantee.But the British and French were careful not to declare war on the Soviet Union for occupying the eastern half of Poland.
Thus Britain was responsible for World War II, first by stupidly interfering in German/Polish negotiations, and second by declaring war on Germany.
Churchill was focused on war with Germany, which he intended for years preceding the war.But Hitler didn’t want any war with Britain or with France, and never intended to invade Britain. The invasion threat was a chimera conjured up by Churchill to unite England behind him.
Hitler expressed his view that the British Empire was essential for order in the world, and that in its absence Europeans would lose their world supremacy.
After Germany’s rout of the French and British armies, Hitler offered an extraordinarily generous peace to Britain.
He said he wanted nothing from Britain but the return of Germany’s colonies.He committed the German military to the defense of the British Empire, and said he would reconstitute both Polish and Czech states and leave them to their own discretion.
He told his associates that defeat of the British Empire would do nothing for Germany and everything for Bolshevik Russia and Japan.
Winston Churchill kept Hitler’s peace offers as secret as he could and succeeded in his efforts to block any peace.Churchill wanted war, largely it appears, for his own glory.Franklin Delano Roosevelt slyly encouraged Churchill in his war but without making any commitment in Britain’s behalf.
Roosevelt knew that the war would achieve his own aim of bankrupting Britain and destroying the British Empire, and that the US dollar would inherit the powerful position from the British pound of being the world’s reserve currency.
Once Churchill had trapped Britain in a war she could not win on her own, FDR began doling out bits of aid in exchange for extremely high prices—for example, 60 outdated and largely useless US destroyers for British naval bases in the Atlantic.
FDR delayed Lend-Lease until desperate Britain had turned over $22,000 million of British gold plus $42 million in gold Britain had in South Africa.Then began the forced sell-off of British overseas investments.
For example, the British-owned Viscose Company, which was worth $125 million in 1940 dollars, had no debts and held $40 million in government bonds, was sold to the House of Morgan for $37 million.
It was such an act of thievery that the British eventually got about two-thirds of the company’s value to hand over to Washington in payment for war munitions. American aid was also “conditional on Britain dismantling the system of Imperial preference anchored in the Ottawa agreement of 1932.”
For Cordell Hull, American aid was “a knife to open that oyster shell, the Empire.”Churchill saw it coming, but he was too far in to do anything but plead with FDR: It would be wrong, Churchill wrote to Roosevelt, if “GreatBritain were to be divested of all saleable assets so that after the victory was won with ourblood, civilization saved, and the time gained for the United States to be fully armed against all eventualities, we should stand stripped to the bone.”
A long essay could be written about how Roosevelt stripped Britain of her assets and world power. Irving writes that in an era of gangster statesmen, Churchill was not in Roosevelt’s league. The survival of the British Empire was not a priority for FDR.
He regarded Churchill as a pushover—unreliable and drunk most of the time. Irving reports that FDR’s policy was to pay out just enough to give Churchill “the kind of support a rope gives a hanging man.”Roosevelt pursued “his subversion of the Empire throughout the war.”
Eventually Churchill realized that Washington was at war with Britain more fiercely than was Hitler.The great irony was that Hitler had offered Churchill peace and the survival of the Empire. When it was too late, Churchill came to Hitler’s conclusion that the conflict with Germany was a “most unnecessary” war.
Hitler forbade the bombing of civilian areas of British cities.It was Churchill who initiated this war crime, later emulated by the Americans.Churchill kept the British bombing of German civilians secret from the British people and worked to prevent Red Cross monitoring of air raids so no one would learn he was bombing civilian residential areas, not war production.
With her book Denying the Holocaust, Deborah Lipstadt tried to show the flawed methods and extremist motives of “Holocaust deniers.” Among other things, she utterly fails to use generally recognized standards of evidence. Given the way she handles documents and data, it is clear that she has no interest in scholarship or reason. In fact, truth has been the antithesis of her enterprise.
The purpose of Churchill’s bombing—first incendiary bombs to set everything afire and then high explosives to prevent firefighters from controlling the blazes—was to provoke a German attack on London, which Churchill reckoned would bind the British people to him and create sympathy in the US for Britain that would help Churchill pull America into the war.
One British raid murdered 50,000 people in Hamburg, and a subsequent attack on Hamburg netted 40,000 civilian deaths.Churchill also ordered that poison gas be added to the firebombing of German civilian residential areas and that Rome be bombed into ashes. The British Air Force refused both orders.
At the very end of the war the British and Americans destroyed the beautiful baroque city of Dresden, burning and suffocating 100,000 people in the attack. After months of firebombing attacks on Germany, including Berlin, Hitler gave in to his generals and replied in kind. Churchill succeeded.
The story became “the London Blitz,” not the British blitz of Germany.
Like Hitler in Germany, Churchill took over the direction of the war.He functioned more as a dictator who ignored the armed services than as a prime minister advised by the country’s military leaders.
Both leaders might have been correct in their assessment of their commanding officers, but Hitler was a much better war strategist than Churchill, for whom nothing ever worked.
To Churchill’s WW I Gallipoli misadventure was now added the introduction of British troops into Norway, Greece, Crete, Syria—all ridiculous decisions and failures—and the Dakar fiasco.
Churchill also turned on the French, destroying the French fleet and lives of 1,600 French sailors because of his personal fear, unfounded, that Hitler would violate his treaty with the French and seize the fleet.
Any one of these Churchillian mishaps could have resulted in a no confidence vote, but with Chamberlain and Halifax out of the way there was no alternative leadership.Indeed, the lack of leadership is the reason neither the cabinet nor the military could stand up to Churchill, a person of iron determination.
Hitler also was a person of iron determination, and he wore out both himself and Germany with his determination. He never wanted war with England and France.This was Churchill’s doing, not Hitler’s.
Like Churchill, who had the British people behind him, Hitler had the German people behind him, because he stood for Germany and had reconstructed Germany from the rape and ruin of the Versailles Treaty.
But Hitler, not an aristocrat like Churchill, but of low and ordinary origins, never had the loyalty of many of the aristocratic Prussian military officers, those with “von” before their name.He was afflicted with traitors in the Abwehr, his military intelligence, including its director, Adm. Canaris.On the Russian front in the final year, Hitler was betrayed by generals who opened avenues for the Russians into undefended Berlin.
Hitler’s worst mistakes were his alliance with Italy and his decision to invade Russia.He was also mistaken to let the British go at Dunkirk. He let them go because he did not want to ruin the chance for ending the war by humiliating the British by the loss of their entire army.
But with Churchill there was no chance for peace. By not destroying the British army, Hitler boosted Churchill who turned the evacuation into British heroics that sustained the willingness to fight on.
It is unclear why Hitler invaded Russia.One possible reason is poor or intentionally deceptive information from the Abwehr on Russian military capability. Hitler later said to his associates that he never would have invaded if he had known of the enormous size of the Russian army and the extraordinary capability of the Soviets to produce tanks and aircraft.
Some historians have concluded that the reason Hitler invaded Russia was that he concluded that the British would not agree to end the war because they expected Russia to enter the war on Britain’s side.Therefore, Hitler decided to foreclose that possibility by conquering Russia.
A Russian has written that Hitler attacked because Stalin was preparing to attack Germany. Stalin did have considerable forces far forward, but It would make more sense for Stalin to wait until the West devoured itself in mutual bloodletting, step in afterwards and scoop it all up if he wanted. Or perhaps Stalin was positioning to occupy part of Eastern Europe in order to put more buffer between the Soviet Union and Germany.
Warsaw ghetto-Zionists starved the Jews: “The whole of Israel throughout the world is uniting to declare an economic and financial war on Germany. Fourteen million Jews scattered over the entire world are tight to each other as if one man, in order to declare war against the German persecutors of their fellow believers. The Jewish wholesaler will quit his house, the banker his stock exchange, the merchant his business, and the beggar his humble hut, in order to join the holy war against Hitler’s people.”
Whatever the reason for the invasion, what defeated Hitler was the earliest Russian winter in 30 years. It stopped everything in its tracks before the well planned and succeeding encirclement could be completed.The harsh winter that immobilized the Germans gave Stalin time to recover.
Because of Hitler’s alliance with Mussolini, who lacked an effective fighting force, resources needed on the Russian front were twice drained off in order to rescue Italy.
Because of Mussolini’s misadventures, Hitler had to drain troops, tanks, and air planes from the Russian invasion to rescue Italy in Greece and North Africa and to occupy Crete.
Hitler made this mistake out of loyalty to Mussolini.Later in the war when Russian counterattacks were pushing the Germans out of Russia, Hitler had to divert precious military resources to rescue Mussolini from arrest and to occupy Italy to prevent her surrender.
Germany simply lacked the manpower and military resources to fight on a 1,000 mile front in Russia, and also in Greece and North Africa, occupy part of France, and man defenses against a US/British invasion of Normandy and Italy.
The German Army was a magnificent fighting force, but it was overwhelmed by too many fronts, too little equipment, and careless communications.The Germans never caught on despite much evidence that the British could read their encryption.Thus, efforts to supply Rommel in North Africa were prevented by the British navy.
Irving never directly addresses in either book the Holocaust.He does document the massacre of many Jews, but the picture that emerges from the factual evidence is that the holocaust of Jewish people was different from the official Zionist story.
No German plans, or orders from Hitler, or from Himmler or anyone else have ever been found for an organized holocaust by gas and cremation of Jews.This is extraordinary as such a massive use of resources and transportation would have required massive organization, budgets and resources.
What documents do show is Hitler’s plan to relocate European Jews to Madagascar after the war’s end.With the early success of the Russian invasion, this plan was changed to sending the European Jews to the Jewish Bolsheviks in the eastern part of Russia that Hitler was going to leave to Stalin.
There are documented orders given by Hitler preventing massacres of Jews.Hitler said over and over that “the Jewish problem” would be settled after the war.
It seems that most of the massacres of Jews were committed by German political administrators of occupied territories in the east to whom Jews from Germany and France were sent for relocation.
Instead of dealing with the inconvenience, some of the administrators lined them up and shot them into open trenches.Other Jews fell victim to the anger of Russian villagers who had long suffered under Jewish Bolshevik administrators.
The “death camps” were in fact work camps. Auschwitz, for example, today a Holocaust museum, was the site of Germany’s essential artificial rubber factory. Germany was desperate for a work force.
A significant percentage of German war production labor had been released to the Army to fill the holes in German lines on the Russian front.
War production sites, such as Auschwitz, had as a work force refugees displaced from their homes by war, Jews to be deported after war’s end, and anyone else who could be forced into work. Germany desperately needed whatever work force it could get.
Every camp had crematoriums. Their purpose was not to exterminate populations but to dispose of deaths from the scourge of typhus, natural deaths, and other diseases. Refugees were from all over, and they brought diseases and germs with them.
The horrific photos of masses of skeleton-like dead bodies that are said to be evidence of organized extermination of Jews are in fact camp inmates who died from typhus and starvation in the last days of the war when Germany was disorganized and devoid of medicines and food for labor camps. The great noble Western victors themselves bombed the labor camps and contributed to the deaths of inmates.
The two books on which I have reported total 1,663 pages, and there are two more volumes of the Churchill biography.This massive, documented historical information seemed likely to pass into the Memory Hole as it is inconsistent with both the self-righteousness of the West and the human capital of court historians.
The facts are too costly to be known. But historians have started adding to their own accounts the information uncovered by Irving. It takes a brave historian to praise him, but they can cite him and plagiarize him.
It is amazing how much power Zionists have gotten from the Holocaust. Norman Finkelstein calls it The Holocaust Industry. There is ample evidence that Jews along with many others suffered, but Zionists insist that it was an unique experience limited to Jews.
In his Introduction to Hitler’s War Irving reports that despite the widespread sales of his book, the initial praise from accomplished historians and the fact that the book was required reading at military academies from Sandhurst to West Point, “I have had my home smashed into by thugs, my family terrorized, my name smeared, my printers [publishers] firebombed, and myself arrested and deported by tiny, democratic Austria—an illegal act, their courts decided, for which the ministerial culprits were punished; at the behest of disaffected academics and influential citizens [Zionists], in subsequent years, I was deported from Canada (in 1992), and refused entry to Australia, New Zealand, Italy, South Africa and other civilized countries around he world. Internationally affiliated groups circulated letters to librarians, pleading for this book to be taken off their shelves.”
So much for free thought and truth in the Western world.Nothing is so little regarded in the West as free thought, free expression, and truth.In the West explanations are controlled in order to advance the agendas of the ruling interest groups. As David Irving has learned, woe to anyone who gets in the way.
“Tokyo Rose”, was a mythical figure created by U.S. newspapers around 1943 in reference to ALL the various female English-speaking radio announcers who broadcasted Japanese propaganda to Allied troops in the south and central Pacific.
They portrayed her as the highly sexualized, manipulative, intelligence-leaking personification of Japanese evil. She became so internationally famous that someone had to be held to account after the war, and as soon as possible.
Consequently, American-born Iva Toguri D’Aquino emerged in 1945, and she was arrested for being the one and only ‘real’ Tokyo Rose. She was accused of treason, and A possible death penalty.
(Above: After the war Hollywood couldn’t resist expanding upon the legend of “Tokyo Rose”, and cashing in on it. In 1946, the film “Tokyo Rose” starred Lotus Long; many years later sold albums of her broadcasts as entertaining nostalgia…)
Iva Toguri D’Aquino was born in Los Angeles on the 4th of July, a daughter of Japanese immigrants. She was raised as a Christian, joined the Girl Scouts, graduated from UCLA in zoology, had a crush on Jimmy Stewart, and was registered as a Republican voter. She was the quintessinal American girl…
The day after her 25th birthday, on July 5th 1941, she sailed for Tokyo to visit a sick aunt. Passports were not required for travel by either the United States or Japan back then — imagine such a time — but all that would soon change after her arrival in Japan.
Witnessing rising tensions inside Japan, she applied for a passport in August with the U.S. Vice Consul in Tokyo stating she wished to return home as soon as possible… But the State Department took its time.
September passed with no word. October passed. Each time she checked on her application’s status, she was mysteriously turned away. Panic bloomed; day after day she felt it in her stomach, and ran from it in her dreams.
Then Pearl Harbor was attacked, trapping her in Japan.
The State Department then refused to certify her citizenship. At the same time, the much-feared Japanese secret police (the Kempetai) pressured her to renounce her U.S. citizenship but shesteadfastly refused.
Japanofficially declared her an enemy alien. Consequently she was neither allowed to leave Japan nor to continue staying with her family there. She couldn’t use a ration card any more, nor receive mail or money from her parents.
Then her own family was interned by the U.S. government; forced to leave everything behind to live behind barbed wire and guard towers in the Arizona desert.
But Iva Toguri D’Aquino was an American to be proud of: she was tough, adaptive, hardworking, and resourceful. She persevered under the watchful eyes of the terrifying Kempetai, found a sympathetic boarding house, and then got a job as a typist at a leading Tokyo news agency, Radio Tokyo (NHK).
In 1943, the Imperial Japanese Army began the common practice of forcing, sometimes torturing, prisoners of war to broadcast propaganda, and because of her native English skills, D’Aquino was coerced into hosting a one-hour radio show called “The Zero Hour”.
She agreed to participate, but only on the condition that she would never be asked to broadcast any anti-American propaganda, and in fact she never did.
Instead, she and other Allied POWs worked together to effectively undermine the Japanese agenda by producing nuanced farcical broadcasts featuring inside jokes, American slang, and double entendres their Japanese handlers weren’t likely to understand. In one such broadcast in 1944, Iva said:
“Greetings, everybody! This is your little playmate—I mean your bitter enemy—Ann, with a program of dangerous and wicked propaganda for my victims in Australia and the South Pacific. Stand by, you unlucky creatures, here I go!”
“So be on your guard, and mind the children don’t hear! All set? Okay! Here’s the first blow at your morale—the Boston Pops playing ‘Strike Up the Band!’”
In another broadcast, Toguri called her listeners “my favorite family of boneheads, the fighting G.I.s in the blue Pacific.”
The news delivered was consequently received by Allied troops as comical entertainment; it actually boosted morale. Had the Japanese ever suspected as much, there is no doubt about what the consequences would’ve been for Iva.
Iva was known on The Zero Hour as “Orphan Annie” — Ann, being short for announcer. The show was mostly live comedy sketches and playing recorded music; she never participated in any newscasts.
Her pay was just $7 per month (as opposed to an American buck private’s pay of $50 monthly), but she regularly risked her life using some of the money to smuggle food and medicine into a nearby POW camp. She married a Portuguese-Japanese man…
Finally, in the heady chaotic closing days of the war, Hearst Publishing went on a witch hunt for finding the real “Tokyo Rose”, offering $2,000 for an exclusive interview.
Iva was so desperate to raise enough money for getting back home, she stepped forward in Yokohama just three days after the surrender before anyone else could accept the offer.
Hearst got their interview all right, but then turned her over to the American occupation authorities. And she was never paid. Instead, Hearst Publishing sold the transcript of her “exclusive” interview to the Supreme Command of the Allied Powers (SCAP) as a “confession” and she spent a year in an occupation prison being interrogated and awaiting trial.
But after hundreds of interrogations, and after reviewing tapes of all her shows, and revisiting testimonies from her American and Australian POW scriptwriters, there was absolutely no evidence she had ever aided the enemy or broadcast anything harmful or demoralizing.
Nevertheless, the FBI and Douglas MacArthur’s headquarters continued to hold her indefinitely anyways. As the charge was treason, day by day she lived with the possibility she might hang soon.
Then one day, without any warning or explanation she was released in Japan. Suddenly she was free, but homeless, destitute, stateless, and more desperate than ever to find a way back home. And then she became pregnant.
Once again, she sought help from the U.S. State Department. More than anything she wanted to give birth on American soil and in the safety of her home with family. Her plight made the news back home and Walter Winchell spoke angrily against her to his nationwide radio audiences.
It was an election year during the Cold War and Harry Truman needed to show he was tough on traitors.
(The supposedly “stolen confession” J. Edgar Hoover referred to below was the Hearst Interview that was sold to the government; he clearly knew it wasn’t really stolen… )
There would be no rescue. She gave birth in 1948, in Japan, and her baby died shortly thereafter. Then, on September 25th that year, she was charged again with 8 counts of treason for giving comfort and aid to the enemy during the war.
Now, finally, she was shipped back to her home country, and imprisoned there for another year until her trial began in September of 1949. It played out as one of the longest and costliest trials in U.S. history.
D’Aquino was found guilty on one count of treason — only the 7th American in history to ever be so convicted.
She was fined $10,000 ($102,000 in 2018 dollars), stripped of her citizenship, and sentenced to 10 years in prison.
The alleged comment which convicted her — not found on any recordings or in any hard evidence — was supposedly made after a bulletin about a sunken American ship:
“… Orphans of the Pacific, you are really orphans now. How will you get home now that your ships are sunk?”
She had never said anything like it but she still served 6 years and two months in a West Virginia women’s prison for that single phrase.
Then she was paroled and allowed to reunite with her family in Chicago as an “alien immigrant”.
Next she had to fight a government deportation order. But she prevailed and finally, and very quietly, felt she could start her life all over again.
For years she wrote to the president of the United States asserting her innocence and asking for a full pardon.
Then a break appeared. American attitudes had changed. A 1976 investigation by the Chicago Tribune discovered that two key witnesses against her had been threatened and coached by the FBI and occupation police in Japan.
The witnesses had perjured themselves. The story received wide news coverage and a treatment with Morley Safer on “60 Minutes”.
President Gerald Ford was so moved, he granted her a full and unconditional pardon, and also restored her American citizenship.
The witnesses who had perjured themselves, however, were never prosecuted.
Iva forgave them though — she felt vindicated and victorious. Then she faded back into privacy, continuing to live out the rest of her life in Chicago until she passed away in 2006 at the age of 90.
According to an NPR broadcast about her life that year, “…she was known as a shrewd businesswoman in Chicago, owning neighborhood real estate and restaurants.”
In the end, Iva Toguri “Tokyo Rose” D’Aquino proved herself to be a genuine American hero who always loved her country, prejudices, injustices and all; good with the bad.She persevered with dignity and integrity.
It’s official ; the moon is made of wood. And so is the WW2 narrative.
The Dutch national Rijksmuseum made an embarrassing announcement that one of its most loved possessions, a moon rock, is a fake — just an old piece of petrified wood that’s never been anywhere near the moon. The moon rock was given to the Dutch prime minister by Apollo 11 astronauts in 1969 as a gesture of goodwill. If the Dutch never examined the rock and discovered the hoax, historians would have done so at a later time. Such is the WW2 and holocaust movie narrative! It’s no crime to study and examine, and announce the results! Unless it messes up a powerful someone’s agenda…
Hitler wanted to end the war in 1940, almost two years before the trains began to roll to the camps.
On Sept. 1, 1939, 70 years ago, the German Army crossed the Polish frontier. On Sept. 3, Britain declared war.
Six years later, 50 million Christians and Jews had perished. Britain was broken and bankrupt, Germany a smoldering ruin. Europe had served as the site of the most murderous combat known to man, and civilians had suffered worse horrors than the soldiers.
By May 1945, Red Army hordes occupied all the great capitals of Central Europe: Vienna, Prague, Budapest, Berlin. A hundred million Christians were under the heel of the most barbarous tyranny in history: the Bolshevik regime of the greatest terrorist of them all, Joseph Stalin.
What cause could justify such sacrifices?
The German-Polish war had come out of a quarrel over a town the size of Ocean City, Md., in summer. Danzig, 95 percent German, had been severed from Germany at Versailles in violation of Woodrow Wilson’s principle of self-determination. Even British leaders thought Danzig should be returned.
Why did Warsaw not negotiate with Berlin, which was hinting at an offer of compensatory territory in Slovakia? Because the Poles had a war guarantee from Britain that, should Germany attack, Britain and her empire would come to Poland’s rescue.
But why would Britain hand an unsolicited war guarantee to a junta of Polish colonels, giving them the power to drag Britain into a second war with the most powerful nation in Europe?
Was Danzig worth a war? Unlike the 7 million Hong Kongese whom the British surrendered to Beijing, who didn’t want to go, the Danzigers were clamoring to return to Germany.
Comes the response: The war guarantee was not about Danzig, or even about Poland. It was about the moral and strategic imperative “to stop Hitler” after he showed, by tearing up the Munich pact and Czechoslovakia with it, that he was out to conquer the world. And this Nazi beast could not be allowed to do that.
If true, a fair point. Americans, after all, were prepared to use atom bombs to keep the Red Army from the Channel. But where is the evidence that Adolf Hitler, whose victims as of March 1939 were a fraction of Gen. Pinochet’s, or Fidel Castro’s, was out to conquer the world?
After Munich in 1938, Czechoslovakia did indeed crumble and come apart. Yet consider what became of its parts.
The Sudeten Germans were returned to German rule, as they wished. Poland had annexed the tiny disputed region of Teschen, where thousands of Poles lived. Hungary’s ancestral lands in the south of Slovakia had been returned to her. The Slovaks had their full independence guaranteed by Germany. As for the Czechs, they came to Berlin for the same deal as the Slovaks, but Hitler insisted they accept a protectorate.
Now one may despise what was done, but how did this partition of Czechoslovakia manifest a Hitlerian drive for world conquest?
Comes the reply: If Britain had not given the war guarantee and gone to war, after Czechoslovakia would have come Poland’s turn, then Russia’s, then France’s, then Britain’s, then the United States.
We would all be speaking German now.
But if Hitler was out to conquer the world — Britain, Africa, the Middle East, the United States, Canada, South America, India, Asia, Australia — why did he spend three years building that hugely expensive Siegfried Line to protect Germany from France? Why did he start the war with no surface fleet, no troop transports and only 29 oceangoing submarines? How do you conquer the world with a navy that can’t get out of the Baltic Sea?
If Hitler wanted the world, why did he not build strategic bombers, instead of two-engine Dorniers and Heinkels that could not even reach Britain from Germany?
Why did he let the British army go at Dunkirk?
Why did he offer the British peace, twice, after Poland fell, and again after France fell?
Why, when Paris fell, did Hitler not demand the French fleet, as the Allies demanded and got the Kaiser’s fleet? Why did he not demand bases in French-controlled Syria to attack Suez? Why did he beg Benito Mussolini not to attack Greece?
Because Hitler wanted to end the war in 1940, almost two years before the trains began to roll to the camps.
Hitler had never wanted war with Poland, but an alliance with Poland such as he had with Francisco Franco’s Spain, Mussolini’s Italy, Miklos Horthy’s Hungary and Father Jozef Tiso’s Slovakia.
Indeed, why would he want war when, by 1939, he was surrounded by allied, friendly or neutral neighbors, save France. And he had written off Alsace, because reconquering Alsace meant war with France, and that meant war with Britain, whose empire he admired and whom he had always sought as an ally.
As of March 1939, Hitler did not even have a border with Russia. How then could he invade Russia?
Winston Churchill was right when he called it “The Unnecessary War” — the war that may yet prove the mortal blow to our civilization.
The World Conquerors: Chapter Nine, “Revenge Is Ours” (1958)
In 1920, returning from the unsuccessful peace·conference of Versailles, President Wilson of the United States announced openly:
“There was a secret force at work in Europe which we were unable to trace.”
ON May 9th, 1945, the revenge of Jehovah was turned loose over Europe. The planes of the British and American Air Forces were still called “liberators “, but Eisenhower announced: “We are not coming here as liberators but as conquerors.”
But were the Americans, in fact, the real victors? In the wake of the advancing American forces a sinister fifth column followed, the members of which in ninety-nine percent of cases were not Americans. This revengeful army was made up of emigrants from Eastern European countries, of black-market operators from Brooklyn ghettos, of Czech, Polish and Hungarian Jews who took refuge in London and of criminal inmates from the liberated concentration camps.
They filled all major and minor posts in the C.I.C. organised according to the Morgenthau Plan; they swarmed in the O.S.S., in the various commissions searching for war criminals, as well as in the American security organisations. They became mayors of German towns and commandants of P.O.W. camps. They administered La Guardia’s U.N.R.R.A. They occupied key positions in the American forces and thus exercised control over them.
There were only 2,524 German war criminals on the original list of the U.N., but soon the C.I.C. and the American conquerors were conducting a search for one million German “war criminals”. At first the Soviets wanted to shoot 50,000 Germans summarily, then they proposed to bring 200,000 “war criminals” to trial at Nuremberg.
Simultaneously, the conquering flood began to move eastwards. A mass of several hundred thousand released from the concentration camps surged towards Poland, Hungary, Rumania and Yugoslavia, to become officers in the Communist police forces and other terror organisations and to assume judicial powers in the people’s tribunals and so be able to pass sentence upon innocent people in an orgy of revenge. They were welcomed with open arms by the Soviet M.V.D. (115) who were in control of the Eastern European countries. The pattern was everywhere the same. In the forefront there was either an American, a Soviet or a French general but in each case a Jewish deputy dogged his heels.
Actually, Europe did not fall under the Russians, British or Americans, but under Jewish occupation. Everything that had rightly or wrongly belonged to Europe for 2,000 years now disintegrated. The avengers continued doing (but more cruelly) the very things they had set down as crimes against Hitler. This was no occupation by the forces of American democracy or Bolshevism but by those of a victorious Jewish nationalism glowing with hatred. Ensconced in key positions among the occupying powers, they were able to punish everyone, whether innocent or guilty. In their eyes there was but one crime ~ to have opposed, or to be in a position to oppose ~ Jewish nationalism.
To be a Jew in Europe became a greater privilege than any enjoyed by even reigning princes of the Middle Ages. The railway stations were guarded by special Jewish police and an identity check of Jews could be carried out by Jewish police only. They received their food ration cards without queueing. For a while, immediately after the war, only Jews received travelling passes, thus securing for themselves free movement and the unrestricted monopoly of the black market. In the refugee camps they were the chief caterers for U.N.R.R.A. as well as the privileged beneficiaries of this relief. Thus, they snatched the best rations from Poles, Ukrainians and Czechs, their former fellow-prisoners in the concentration camps. At the same time, on the roads, military policemen overturned cans and spilled milk to deprive German children and hospital patients of their diet.
In German cities, working-class families were turned out of their homes by the tens of thousands, thus rendering vacant the nicest workers’ settlements. The victims had to leave behind everything ~ furniture, kitchen equipment and cooking utensils, clothing and even linen, thus forcing the German people to recompense three times over in the form of Wiedergutmachung (reparations) the actual value of the goods confiscated from the Jews.
Uniformed Zionist guards were posted at camp gates and, at first, for a while, even the Military Police of the victorious American Army could not enter Jewish camps. Victorious Jewish nationalism was granted (116) similar rights in the East, in Slovakia, in some parts of Rumania, in Hungary and Bohemia. They took possession of the flats and furniture of the Gentiles, occupied key positions in government offices and in editorial posts of the national press. Concurrently, former Jewish journalists returned to Germany and took complete charge of the newspapers of the occupied zones, and began to incite revenge upon the German nation on its own soil.
“It is from us that the all-engulfing terror proceeds…” wrote the Protocols fifty years ago. And now, backed by Soviet and American arms, the most dreadful terror descended on Europe, often without the Americans and English being aware of it. Hitlerism and the war was finished with, but neither peace nor law and order or justice or democracy were restored.
The Western and Eastern Jew set out hand-in-hand to liquidate the Christian upper classes who had succeeded in escaping to the West from Bolshevism. These were considered unreliable people. Vlassov’s Cossacks, for instance, wanted to fight against Bolshevism. But whoever resists Bolshevism is actually fighting one section of the Jewish world-kingdom.
These Cossacks knew very well who were the commissars of the collective farms (kolkhoz) before whom the Russian peasant had to go down on his knees. In 1940, they had seen the “Russian” M.V.D. entering Latvia, Estonia and Lithuania and thus knew the Jews almost exclusively organised the deportation of tens of thousands of unfortunate people from these small Baltic states. These people were dangerous because they had witnessed certain things. These witnesses must be slain!
How can one account for the fate of Vlassov’s Cossacks otherwise than by Jewish nationalism operating behind the visible power. How else could such inhumanity be accounted for when British democracy allowed armed military police to deploy against thousands of unarmed Cossacks?
“I was calling on Vlassov,” writes Laszlo Gaal, a Hungarian journalist, “when a lieutenant wearing a German uniform and whose forehead was bathed in blood, burst into the small country cottage and reported direct to the general standing amongst his three staff officers: “‘Sir,everything is lost! We are to be handed over to the Bolsheviks!'” (117)
You who are reading this book did not see the P.O.W. camp with its fourteen feet high wire fencing and its wooden barracks. You never heard that cry of despair when the white-belted and white-helmeted military police came to hand the Cossacks over. Tear gas bombs had to be thrown into every room. The Cossacks hurriedly knotted their shirts into ropes to hang themselves before the military police could force its way in. They barricaded the doors, then broke in the windows and fought for every piece of broken glass in order to cut open their veins. Old friends tried to cut each other’s throats. Those unable to die this way tore off their shirts, offering their bared breast, shouting; “Shoot here, for I am not going back to Soviet Russia.” (Pittsburgi Magyarsag, July 2nd, 1954.) (Also Magyarok Utja, edited in Argentina.)
The clamour of the same executioners was heard throughout Europe from the English Channel to the Black Sea. It was not Nazism that had to be liquidated now, but the leaders of the Christian nations irrespective of political creed or party.
Those who rounded up “war criminals” by the ten thousand and tortured both guilty and innocent in their jails were, almost exclusively, Jews. The commandants, captains and secret agents in the jails for “war criminals” at Salzburg and other places, as well as in the notorious Marcus Camp were, almost without exception, Jews dressed in American uniform. According toa Jugoslav refugee who had been in the camp at Klagenfurt, its British Commandant, who handed over “war criminals” and compelled them by force to return to Communist dictatorship, proudly put a notice on his desk sporting the inscription “I AM A JEW!”
The Jews handed patriots over to the gallows and to the common grave. They handed over 100,000 gallant soldiers of the Croatian Army to the partisans of Tito and to Moša Pijade, who summarily executed them all.
The caves and abandoned trenches of Slovenia were utilised as common graves. Vlassov is a symbolic figure in this great tragedy, in the slaughter of millions. He was the last person capable of rallying an army of several million men under his flag against the Stalinist dictatorship. So, naturally, this symbolic personality was handed over by the Western democracies to the Bolshevik terror regime. To the Jew, Lavrentiy Beria, was given the pleasing task of organising (118) Vlassov’s public execution in Moscow. And because all this happened with the approval of America, an incurable wound was inflicted on the soul of Europe.
Everything that took place in Eastern Europe can, perhaps, be explained away by the cruelty of the Bolsheviks, although we know very well that the agents of Jewish nationalism were its real instigators. At the end of the war the casualties of the German Reich amounted to 8,300,000 dead; 3,300,000 German soldiers were killed in action; more than 2,500,000 of these in the fight against Bolshevism. 1,200,000 civilians, amongst them many women and children, were killed in air raids.
More than 1,400,000 men perished or were murdered in captivity by the Eastern and Western allies, mostly in Soviet P.O.W. camps. 2,400,000 Eastern Germans were butchered by the Soviet occupation forces invading East Prussia, or killed by an aerial warfare blindly extended to include the civilian population. To all these things hypocrites can retort: “Well, after all, this is what is called total and all-out war!” But nobody could explain away by referring to “total war” what happened in Czechoslovakia on the day of the armistice. When the last Wehrmacht units left Prague, Jewish Communists, led by Slansky-Salzman, returned from Moscow to the Czech capital where they proceeded to gather together the revengeful ex-prisoners of Hitler’s concentration camps ~ the “liberating” partisans.
“The Czech Communists made very clever use of those unfortunate Jews,” wrote Vilag on March 15th, 1953, “who came out of the extermination camps half dead. They put these Jews in charge of the expatriation of Sudeten-Germans and Hungarians. The idea was not at all new as Lavrentiy Beria did the same when he used Polish and Ukrainian Jews to hunt down the Ukrainian and Polish ‘anti-Semites’, i.e. those who could be supposed to have collaborated with the Nazis.”
And because they believed that this supposition could be extended to include nearly everybody, they began a campaign of revenge unprecedented in the history of mankind.
When Edvard Beneš, the great humanitarian, the “bel espirit” and master of freemasonry entered Prague on Sunday, May 13th, 1945, German citizens were burned alive in his honour in St. Wenceslas Square. (Document No. 15 concerning the expulsion of the Sudeten Germans.) Many Germans were hung up by their feet from the big (119) advertising posters in St. Wenceslas Square, then when the great humanitarian approached their petrol-soaked bodies were set on fire to form living torches.
Six hundred thousand Sudeten Germans were killed during the massacres in the earthly hell of the death camps of Czechoslovakia. The Sudeten German White Paper records these horrors with full details on more than 1,000 pages, horrors for which there is no precedent in the history of mankind. Armed Czech women and Jewesses continued hitting the womb of expectant mothers with truncheons until a miscarriage followed, and in one single camp ten German women died daily in this way. (Document No. 6.) In another camp, the inmates were forced to lick up the bespattered brains of their fellow-prisoners who had been beaten to death. German prisoners were forced to lick up infectious feces from the underwear of their fellow-prisoners suffering from dysentery. (Document No. 17.) The Czech and Jewish doctors refused all medical aid to German women raped by the Russians. Hundreds of thousands died by these means or sought salvation in suicide, as, for instance, in Brno (Brun), where on a single day 275 women committed suicide.
Naturally, the Western” humanitarian” press, the American radio network and the B.B.C. commentators took good care never to mention these facts, although they themselves were in the first place responsible for this campaign of revenge to which they instigated the members of their own nations. They were thus guilty of poisoning the soul of Christendom by the hatred they induced.
But Czechoslovakia was not the first state where horrors of this type occurred. Ana Rabinovich Pauker returned to Rumania as early as August, 1944, and under the orders of the Eastern Jews who arrived with her, massacres began there too.
According to authentic Bulgarian emigrant sources, 30,000 members of the professional classes were murdered in the trail of the invading Soviet armies by Bulgarian “proletarians”, led by those “ladines” whose forefathers had been expelled from Spain by Catholic Ferdinand. Similarly, in Belgrade and Southern Hungary the name of Moša Pijade is connected with bloody “purges” the victims of which were Serbian intelligentsia, prosperous German settlers and the most intelligent Hungarian peasantry. When, in October, 1944, the German and Hungarian armies left the territories of Yugoslavia (120) and Southern Hungary an unprecedented wave of mass-murders broke over the unprotected population. Thirty thousand Hungarians, mostly peasants and smallholders, died in this bloodshed, under the savage terror regime of Moša Pijade’s partisans.
The Katyn Wood murders are a modest, amateurish effort in comparison with it. According to documentary proof in our hands, Hungarians, Germans and Croatians alike, died slow and horrible deaths wracked with agony. Besides the 30,000 Hungarians, nearly 200,000 Germans died in the death camps of the “liberators”, where powdered glass was mixed with the children’s food and where with the finesse of Chinese executioners those to perish in the biological class-warfare were dispatched, in order that their places as civic leaders and police officers could be taken by the revengeful representatives of Jehovah.
In this classic age of race murder, the case of Hungary is quite extraordinary. This unfortunate nation, even in its dismembered state after the 1920 Parish treaties, had provided 560,000 Jews with peaceful and safe homes. The Hungarian nation did not take vengeance on Jewry even after the first Communist dictatorship of Bela Kun in 1919-1920, despite the fact that Jews, almost exclusively, were the commissars and leaders of this Communist régime.
During the era between the two World Wars, 1,100,000 acres were owned by Jews out of a total of 9,000,000 acres of arable land. A Jewish minority of six percent possessed fifty-one percent of house property in Budapest, thirty percent of the total national income and twenty-five percent of the total national assets. When, after the German occupation, the state authorities listed the property and assets of Jewry amassed in less than a hundred years, it was estimated that it possessed the equivalent of nineteen wagon loads of gold, silver and jewels, whilst the total gold reserve of the Hungarian National Bank could have been loaded into twelve wagons easily. Later, the American authorities returned all this amassed wealth to Jewry.
As late as 1943, Hungary was the last refuge of the Jews in Europe. Despite this, when the war was over and the country overrun by Stalin’s hordes, the revengeful spirit of The Old Testament inflicted horrors on the innocent Hungarian people without precedent in the history of mankind. Under the protection of Soviet bayonets the Muscovite emigrants returned, all of them Jews without exception. (121) Closely behind them followed many thousands of young Maccabees, released unharmed from the labour divisions of the “Fascist” regime. They soon became terrorist colonels and police officers of the M.V.D., as well as party secretaries and police chiefs of the provincial cities. From the ghettos of Budapest 200,000 Jews were released almost without loss ~ Jews whom the Hungarian Nazis had been unwilling to hand over to the Germans.
One million Hungarian women were raped by the Russian Bolshevik troops, usually led by Jewish commandants. Six hundred thousand prisoners of war, as well as 230,000 civilians, were dragged off to extermination camps in the Soviet Union. At the most modest estimate, 500,000 people were murdered by the Jews in the cells of 60, Andrássy út, Budapest, in internment camps or in the open streets. All the characteristic features of biological class-warfare can be distinguished in this campaign of revenge. The Hungarian middle classes, the intellectuals and the national leaders had to be slain so that their places could be taken by another middle-class by the Jews! And, moreover, those who presided as judges in the revolutionary tribunals were almost all Jews.
In Western Europe, a Hungarian-born “American”, Colonel Martin Himmler, directed the campaign of vengeance against 300,000 Hungarians who escaped from the Bolsheviks. Was this man a Communist? Or was he an American democrat? At all events, in its issue of April 30th, 1954, the Uj Kelet (New Orient), a Zionist Tel-Aviv paper, let the cat out of the bag ~ he was neither; he was a Jew!
In the commentary reviewing Martin Himmler’s work and career he is highly praised as one who came forward to “revenge the shedding of innocent Jewish blood”.
One wonders whether Cardinal Mindszenty was also “a Hungarian Nazi murderer” who during the war rescued and protected persecuted Jews, and who after the war tried to protect and rescue persecuted Christians. Cardinal József Mindszenty was not a victim of the Communist terror but of racial revenge, because be had demanded an amnesty for tens of thousands of tortured Hungarians during the great massacres and gruesome pogroms directed against Christians.
Jozsef Mindszenty in his earlier capacity as Bishop of Veszprem, vehemently opposed the Hungarian Nazi Government of the day. (122) He rescued Jews whom the Germans wanted to deport by giving them Papal safe conduct passes. After the Szalasi Government came to power he protested against continuing the fighting. In the end the Hungarian Nazi Government was compelled to intern him at Sopronkohida as an enemy of the Germans and the greatest protector of Jewry.
Shortly after that the tables were turned. The armies of the Soviet barbarians occupied Hungary. Jozsef Mindszenty was released from captivity at Sopronkohida and as Archbishop of Hungary, rapidly became one of the leading constitutional figures.
Whatever his private political views may have been, he felt that, asa Catholic and leading exponent of Christianity, it was his duty to protect Hungarians against Jewish persecution, just as he had protected Jews against German persecution. In his letter written to Ferenc Nagy, Prime Minister after 1945, he pointed out clearly that “anti-Semitism” could only be successfully eradicated were “war criminals” to be granted a general amnesty and were the campaign of revenge against the Hungarian nation to be called off forthwith.
From this moment Jozsef Mindszenty, Cardinal of Hungary, who wished to check the campaign of revenge against the Hungarian people, became an “anti-Semite”.
Peter Fuerst, a Zionist writer, made murderous accusations against him. According to Fuerst, it was generally known in Budapest that Cardinal Mindszenty was an “anti-Semite”. The printed “anti-Semitic” leaflet edited by him was in the possession of the Jewish Centre at Budapest. During the Mindszenty Trials several Jewish organisations asked if it were a fact that Mindszenty was known in the West as “pro-Semitic”. Bertha Gaster, correspondent of the London News Chronicle, met Cardinal Mindszenty. During one of her interviews, Gaster was surprised to hear the Cardinal using strong terms concerning the conduct of Hungarian Jewry. At the end of the interview Miss Gaster rose, thanked him for the statements he had made, but, at the same time, let him know that she was a Jewess herself and an active member of the London Jewish Community. The Jewish Clarion of February 1949, asserted that Jozsef Mindszenty was, in fact, a notorious “anti-Semite” because he demanded an amnesty for “war criminals”. (123)
At the same time the Jewish Chronicle wrote in its issue of February 4th, 1949: “Hungarian Jewish organisations have learned with great surprise that Western Jewish organisations took the side of Mindszenty, whom these statements show up as the arch-enemy of Hungarian and East European Jewry.”
It was enough to brand the “pro-Semitic” Mindszenty, who saved the lives of many thousands of Jews, with “anti-Semitism” for the most sinister campaign of revenge to start against him immediately. The hatred of Eastern Jews was picked up by Western Jews so that soon, from both East and West alike a campaign was in progress against a Christian high priest whose only “crime” was to remain human and to raise his voice against the persecution of his own people.
It was Mátyás Rákosi-Roth, the Communist dictator, who entered the lists against him, whilst “ideologically” this campaign was led by Jozsef Revai, Minister of Education, whose real name was Moses Kahana. Amongst his own priests who betrayed him the first was Istvan Balogh ~ alias Izrael Bloch. Those who produced faked evidence were Ivan Boldizsar, alias Bettelheim, a press chief; Reissman, chief of the publicity department, and Gera, alias Grunsweig, deputy propaganda chief. Hanna and Laszlo Sulner who prepared “his” forged manuscripts were also Jews.
Colonel Kraftanov, the Soviet hangman, was brought specially from Moscow. Benjamin Perer-Auspitz, the chief interrogator, put him through the third degree; the Jew Karpati-Krausz, a wrestling champion, was his torturer; Imre Zipszer, the Jewish prison governor, sat next to him all the time, even during the court hearings; and finally, Balassa-Blaustein and Emil Weil administered stupefactive drugs to him.
The Primate of Hungary and the protector of Jewry thus became the victim of the Jews because he wished to prevent a campaign of revenge against his nation.
About this time, even such a well-known Communist as László Rajk, whose first wife was of Jewish origin, fell victim to the same tribal “Nazism”. He used abusive language about the Jewish descent of Ernő Gerő Singer, Chief Communist Commissar in the 1936 Spanish Civil War and from this moment he was considered an “anti-Semite”. It was in vain that he helped to murder the best (124) part of the Hungarian ideological elite when he was Minister of the Interior. During a party conference he frankly told Mátyás Rákosi-Roth that “Communism would not spread because there were too many Jews amongst its leaders”. From that moment his doom was sealed. He ended his ignominious life on Rakosi’s gallows.
The great Hungarian patriot László Endre, who finished his life on the gallows of tribal “Nazism”, wrote the exact truth in his farewell letter of March 21st, 1946, the day of his martyrdom. “The contents of the Protocols of the Elders of Zion are true. The means are in their hands by now to accomplish world-hegemony and they will destroy everything that might impede them in building this new world state. Therefore all that is now happening concerns in no way the administration of justice but only prevention and revenge. This entails the destruction of not only those who have done something, but also of those who might do or could have done something.”
All these cases so far reported concerned defeated states. But let us see whether the position was any better in the states which won the war after sacrificing the lives and blood of their sons and risking their very existence.
Neither Germany nor her allies were the first victims of the revenge of Jehovah but rather victorious France, where, after the departure of the German troops, the fateful purge started. The blood bath of the Commune of Paris in 1871 was nothing in comparison to what took place in victorious France during the summer of 1944. Twenty thousand French lives were lost during the terror regime of the Great French Revolution; eighteen thousand French people died on the barricades of the Commune of Paris. But now one hundred and fifty thousand French citizens perished in more horrible circumstances than ever before.
During the Great French Revolution there was at least some pretence of trial by courts or tribunals. But in 1944, French people were shot dead like rabbits. The victims of the Great French Revolution, the Dantons and the others, were at least able to mount the stairs to the guillotine with straight features and an unimpaired body. But in 1944, fifty percent of these French victims were half dead from torture before being killed. Their bodies were lacerated, their nails plucked out with pincers and their flesh burned by red-hot irons or cigarette butts. Behind General de Gaulle (125) a Polish Jew called Thomas, one of the leaders of the Spanish Red Brigade, was the chief perpetrator of these monstrosities. He organised common criminals from the jails together with ex-prisoners from the concentration camps into storm-troops to wreak vengeance.
“The whole massacre was brought about by the propaganda of Jews on the B.B.C.,” wrote the German paper Der Weg, “who let loose the bloodthirsty devils of revenge.” “Nazi collaborators” were not primarily the victims of these massacres, but peasants with large farms and the French intellectual elite.
In Belgium and the Netherlands, the same retribution continued, though with more regard to preserve some kind of semblance of legal formality. The charge of “collaboration” was brought against 480,519 people and out of these 1,208 were sentenced to death. All those who volunteered for work in Germany were convicted.
The basic motives of this campaign of revenge were not only induced by the terrible sight of the ruins but also by the guilty conscience of Jewry. The real war criminals had a foreboding that one day they might be called upon to render an account for what they had done in planning the war as well as for its barbarism. They had to produce an even greater criminal. To justify their revenge they had to find something apparently even more horrible than the 300,000 dead bodies of Dresden or the Katyn Wood murders or the massacres of Bromberg, which could be used as an eyewash to mislead public opinion.
The massacres of 1945, on the other hand, could not be justified by anything else than by the magnification several hundred times over of cruelties committed by the Germans. Not only revenge as such had to be justified, but the post-war attitude of Jewry itself, which shocked a good many members of the Jewish community.
Sussmanovics, a Soviet Jew, Commandant of Budapest in 1945, summoned the author, Gizella Molinary, to his office and said to her: “Why bother me with your complaint that you are ignored and let down by your former Jewish friends? Look down on the street from my window here! The war is still raging; the Red Armies have not yet reached the outskirts of Vienna. In the German concentration camps belated efforts are being made to exterminate the Jews, yet ~ look out of this window and see what is going on down there in the street! The Jews here have little thought for their brothers pleading for their lives in distant countries.
Have any of them any intention (126) of fighting to save them? On the ruins of gutted and burned shops, in the doorways of houses and even on graves, the small pair of scales and a big poster appear: ‘Gold is bought and sold’, says the poster. Here, the soldier throws away his rifle and the writer his pen for everyone is sitting on graves buying and selling gold. Why do you look at me like that? Because I am aware of these things? Of course I am! I am a Jew myself and I am filled with bitter rage and contrition.” (From In the Shadow of the Mindszenty Trials by Aladar Kovach, page 131.)
A special technique of psychological terror had to be employed, therefore, to cover up all these things. Quite a number of Jewish witnesses gave evidence at Nuremberg that though they lived in the vicinity of crematoria they were not aware of their existence. Nevertheless, radio commentators and judges taunted the German people with: “You all knew of these! You are all murderers!” If anyone, even a bishop or a cardinal, tried to raise a word of protest and state the truth, he was silenced with the threat of “Nazi”! Perhaps he was also threatened with being handed over to the Russians. Thus not only the German people but the whole of cultured Europe was intimidated. Thus a stage was reached when nobody dared to tell the truth or state the basic facts forfear of appearing to defend murder and atrocities.
The foul propaganda campaign brought about a state of affairs in which the lie appeared as the truth, revenge as administration of justice and a truthful utterance as a condonation of war crimes.
This propaganda tried to convince the ill-informed Gentile masses that the Jews were the only victims of this war and that no other nations suffered any losses whatever. It remained silent about the common graves dug for ten millions of Gentile victims and not a word was said about the massacred Hungarians, Rumanians, Bulgarians and Frenchmen. At the same time the story of Jewry’s sufferings was exaggerated beyond all measure. In so doing, the privileges enjoyed by Jews in U.N.R.R.A. and I.R.O., as occupation authorities, in receiving the lion’s share of the food rations and in holding the black market monopoly, were also justified.
Thus they attempted to justify the outrage of handing over the elite of Central Europe to the Soviets ~ or those of them they had not murdered themselves.
A new age had now dawned in which Jewry could escape the (127) consequences of any deed, however dastardly, and the whole of Christian Europe became a happy hunting ground for Jewry’s revenge. It was enough to speak Hungarian in the streets of Munich to be immediately picked up and handed over to the Communist hangman by the Military Police, whom the Jewish executioners called in promptly. Thus an atmosphere was created in which the allied military authorities not only became unable to check Jewry’s revengeful excesses, but also in which their own existence was jeopardised if they showed any reluctance to offer themselves as instruments of Jewry’s aims.
What, in fact, happened in Europe between 1945 and 1950 was nothing else but an uncanny materialisation of the prophecies of the “forged” Protocols.
In this way the victorious Western allies lost their independence. And in the shadow of the National Flags associated with Magna Carta, the Declaration of Independence and the Code Napoleon, the Nuremberg Trials began. (128)